In the past I would simmer stock without a lid on, and the results were generally good. Strong flavor and good gelling after refrigeration. The only problem is that this resulted in very little stock to make soup out of, so I would have to water it down. Lately I have been trying leaving the lid on while simmering but it doesn't seem to work as well. The stock never gels at all (even when adding chicken feet to my usual chicken bones) and the taste is bland. I cannot see any reason why it would make a difference, but is there some advantage to reducing a stock first and then adding liquid as needed later? Does this extract flavor better?
Stock Reduction – Reducing Stock and Then Adding Water: What You Need to Know
brothchicken-stockreductionstock
Related Topic
- Making the most out of stock
- How to simmer bone broth safely with an overnight pause
- Can fish stock be left simmering for a long time without damaging the flavor
- Stock questions. What to taste for when making stock
- Chicken – How to use meat from bones when making stock
- Chicken – How quickly can chicken stock turn sour
- Chicken – My stock made from leftover rotisserie chicken is very gelatinous. I thought only uncooked chicken bones made stock gelatinous. Any explanation
Best Answer
Basically, a good stock is fairly concentrated. In general, home cooks use too high a water to bones/veg ratio for a proper result. So, when you leave your stock uncovered you are concentrating everything and, perhaps, getting a good result...at least one you like. However, this is difficult to tell without knowing your recipe. With respect to adding water back later, it is not an uncommon practice to reduce a well-made stock further, by half or more, simply for storage purposes. Then when ready to use, water is added to bring it back to the original strength.