Starch is extensively well-researched in food science, so the short answer is yes, there is an authoritative source; there are a myriad of authoritative sources.
The caveat (there's always a caveat) is that food scientists are doing controlled experiments using far more sophisticated methods than pasta and a boiling pot, and they tend to be primarily interested in more theoretical questions than this, because there are an absurd number of variables at work in your own kitchen:
- Type and quantity of pasta;
- Purity and quantity of the water;
- Type, purity, and quantity of salt;
- Water temperature;
- Cooking time;
- And so on...
So, really, to a scientist, the question "does adding salt to pasta water reduce sticking?" is bordering on ridiculous. The answer is, as the answer often is, it depends.
The following is taken from Starch: Chemistry and Technology, an academic tome that is all about - you guessed it - starch.
Effects of salts on gelatinization are more complex than those of nonionic solutes, as they are solute-specific and concentration-dependent. For most electrolytes, an increase in gelatinization temperature, Tm, is found at low salt concentrations. At high salt concentrations, Tm decreases and can even drop below the initial value.
[...] In general, the effect of neutral salts on starch gelatinization follows the order of the classical Hofmeister (lyotropic) series, particularly in the case of anions. [...but] cations of different chloride salts exhibit a more complicated behavior as evidenced with polarizing microscopy.
(Source)
In plain English: Adding a little salt might reduce the gelation and thus sticking. Adding a lot of salt might increase gelation and sticking. The definition of "a little" and "a lot" depends on how much and what kinds of starch are in the pasta, what else might be in the pasta (some already have salt!), how dispersed the starch already is in the water, what kind of salt you're using... you get the idea.
Incidentally, here's the Hofmeister series that the above refers to:
(Source)
Table salt is sodium chloride - NaCl. You'll notice that Na+ is about halfway to the "salt out" side and Cl- is right smack in the middle. So, even with my limited understanding of all the mechanics at work, it does stand to reason that the effects of having both would be unpredictable. It's easier to predict the effects when you have something like calcium perchlorate, i.e. Ca(ClO4)2, where both the anions and cations are on the "salt in" side. Obviously, those kinds of salts are not in your average home kitchen and I doubt that they're even used in commercial food plants.
...although there are other well-known culinary salts other than sodium chloride, including ammonium chloride AKA salmiac, the (in)famous "salty liquorice" salt. That is technically still "salt". Which salt you choose will of course have wildly different effects on chemical properties including starch interaction.
So hopefully this helps explain some of the wildly opposing anecdotal reports you've read. There is no simple answer because your kitchen is not controlled conditions. However, there is some truth to the statement that salt inhibits starch gelation. It might have that effect, at the right concentration and with the right set of ingredients.
You've got this all mixed up! Unless you're deglazing to do a pan sauce, the steak should be the LAST thing cooked. It's the centerpiece of the dish and the most expensive part, and shouldn't have a chance to get cold while you cook the other parts. Saving cleaning on a single saucepan is not worth eating cold steak.
You MUST use a stainless or cast-iron for this. As others touch on, teflon is not safe for searing, and fast temperature changes will wreck it.
Here's how to do things:
- Julienne onions to saute, prepare and measure stock, trim fat from steak, cut or butterfly it if needed (this is your mise en place).
- Start preheating saute pan for onions
- Start butter melting in saucepan for roux
- Prepare roux and saute onions at same time, then add stock to roux, whisk, and season
- Transfer onions to bowl, cover to keep hot, and start to preheat pan for searing steak
- Cook steak while finishing sauce as needed, then rest it appropriately
- Plate steak, garnish, sauce, and serve
Alternately, here's another approach:
- Mise en place (prep ingredients, optionally pre-measure them)
- Prepare sauce in advance, set aside or keep hot. Or, even do it the day before and reheat it. It's a roux-based sauce; it won't go bad in the fridge, and will reheat beautifully.
- Saute onions. Or, caramelize onions beforehand, and just reheat them briefly and add.
- Cook steak
- Plate, sauce, serve
And, finally the deglazed pan sauce way
- Mise en place
- Sautee onions. Set aside in bowl (or on a serving plate)
- Cook steak
- Throw heavy cream or red wine in to pan, and deglaze by scraping vigorously with a utensil and stirring as it boils vigorously
- Quickly season this, and throw in the onions, a few pinches of parsley, pepper, salt, garlic, and paprika, plus optionally thyme
- Congrats, you now have a pan sauce with onions to throw on your steak
In a professional kitchen, you'd have your onions pre-sauteed or sauteeing at the same time as the steak, and your sauce will be prepared in bulk, beforehand. You'd only have to cook the steak and briefly heat or season the other two parts.
Best Answer
It really depends on what your goal is; that is, what you are doing with the pasta. If you are making most authentic Italian pasta dishes, the slightly under cooked pasta is transferred to the pan in which the condiment was prepared. It is then tossed with some water from the pot that that the pasta was cooked in, along with some butter or olive oil (depending on the region of the dish). This finishes the cooking, emulsifies the sauce, and mixes in the the condiment. The final dish is not about pasta or the condiment in isolation, but rather the combination. Just like a salad is not about the lettuce, per se, but the combination of lettuce and dressing. It is true that pasta will potentially absorb the sauce and get mushy if stored in fridge. This is less of a problem if sauced appropriately, but still, it is possible.
First choice, prepare only enough pasta for the meal. Depending on the type of pasta, you are only looking at a maximum of 10 - 12 minutes of cooking and often less. So, it's not really about convenience. If you find you have cooked more than you need, you could always chill and reserve non-sauced pasta, then reheat it in condiment at another time. But, in my opinion, this would be inferior to freshly cooked, and take almost as much time.
If your goal is a cold pasta salad, by all means, cook, chill, then mix with dressing whenever you need it.