I see companies selling USE-2/RHH/RHW-2 individual wires. Many claim they are fit for direct burial or fixation to joists. They are individual wires, and lack an outer jacket like SE-R or MH feeder has.
Can that be right?
If all that's true, it would seem like a nice solution to applications where conduit is desired for part of a run but individual wires for the rest.
Is the jacket extra tough to be able to endure direct exposure to soil/sand/crushing force? How does it cope with the "all related wires must be in the same cable or conduit" rule of thumb?
If not, then what is the advantage of this cable over, say, XHHW-2 or THWN-2? Why would my distributor go to the expense of stocking both?
Best Answer
USE-2/RHH-2/RHW-2 can be direct buried, but otherwise requires a raceway
The rules for USE-2 wire and cable can be found in NEC 338.12(B):
This, practically, limits single-rated USE-2 wires and cables to direct burial applications, or use as a multiplex cable-in-conduit outdoors. (You can't use it indoors or for general aboveground work, even when in a raceway!)
However, when the wire has a RHH-2/RHW-2 rating as well, that changes the picture. Now, the wire is rated for use in raceway, as the table 310.104(A) entry for this type of conductor specifies a flame-retardant insulating material. However, it still cannot be used strapped to joists bared, as this violates NEC 300.3(A):
and NEC 398.10 only permits the use of open wiring on insulators in industrial and agricultural occupancies:
while NEC 394.10 only permits limited use of knob-and-tube to extend wiring in existing buildings, and 394.12 point 5 also prohibits the use of K&T within insulation:
Even though you can use it in conduit, you probably shouldn't
Even though tri-rated USE-2/RHH-2/RHW-2 can be legally used in conduit jobs, it's probably a bad idea to use it. Why? It has a thicker insulation than THHN or XHHW-2, which uses up more precious conduit fill area than necessary and makes the wire stiffer and harder to pull as well. It's also slightly more expensive than XHHW-2, making it a rather pointless choice to make.