Some countries, outside the US, supply 3-Phase power direct to individual apartments (aka "flats") in highrise towers. [ Especially former UK colonies and the like, and also noted on this thread in some cases in US too: Why do I have three phase electricity? ].
Isn't this a very wrong thing to do from the point of view of stability of the grid supply, because the currents in the phases will be unbalanced, compared to running proper 3-phase equipment/loads which automatically balance the phases? After all, what is the individual apartment dweller supposed to do with each phase? All his/her appliances run on single phase. Balancing the phases would be nigh impossible, precluding, of course, a wye-delta transformer for the whole apartment or house (let's ignore that possibility)!
Any thoughts?
Best Answer
All distribution is 3-phase - if not to the pole, at least to the neighborhood.
So what choice do you have? Nobody is seriously going to run a big single-phase distribution system**, and do a large conversion from 3-phase to 1-phase, simply over imbalance.
It averages out
Imbalances aren't as big a deal as you might think. With a sufficiently large number of houses to average over, eventually load per phase averages out.
If for some reason it doesn't, the power company can change which phase a particular flat or block is tapping.
Now if the town's large industry decides to heavily load one phase and create an imbalance, then they might get a serious talking-to by the power company. Because they are big enough to create an imbalance too big to average out.
** Except the railroad. Look on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor, see the even number of power lines? Single phase. They have to solve the "how do you put an enormous single-phase load on 3-phase" problem.