Neutral and ground seperation at a sub-panel

circuit breakergroundingneutralsubpanel

Could someone explain to me why the neutral and ground bars are never bonded on a sub panel? It's my understanding that the reason they're separated is so that the current returning on the neutral doesn't cross over to the ground and return to the main panel. But if ground and neutral under normal circumstances don't shock you then why is it necessary to separate them in the sub-panel in the first place? Is it because there is the possibility of the current crossing over to the ground that a breaker might not register a spike in current and fail to trip?

Thanks for taking time to answer my questions.

Best Answer

We don't build the system for normal circumstances. If we did, we wouldn't need circuit breakers, would we? :)

Ever hear of a "Lost Neutral" situation? This is where neutral becomes loose or broken, and is no longer pegged in the middle at 0V between the two opposite 120V phases (or at 0V in between the three 230V phases in Europe). Neutral is subject to a "tug-of-war" amongst the various phases - the more load on a phase, the harder it pulls. This causes the weaker phase's voltage to go higher than spec, which often burns out equipment.

Suffice it to say, neutral is no longer at 0V, and could be as high as 120V or 230V if only a single appliance is turned on (or still functioning).

Now, what would happen if the ground was attached to that lost neutral, i.e. the chassis of all equipment? Well that would be at a high voltage along with the neutral, and people would be getting nailed off switch plate cover screws.

That's... why you maintain ground separately at all points beyond the main disconnect.