We have about 3" of old insulation in our attic. We want to bring it up to R49 but I have read that some suggest taking it to R60 to get more energy efficiency. This may not be a question that can be answered without seeing the attic, but would the extra few hundred dollar be worth the energy saving benefits? The attic is already air sealed as well. Thanks for any insight.
Worth going from R49 to R60 in attic
insulation
Related Topic
- Help with improving HVAC performance on the second floor of an old house
- Insulate rigid rectangular duct
- Considering replacing blown cellulose on attic floor with open cell spray foam. Should I just leave well enough alone
- Water – cold water too hot in AZ—worth it to insulate attic copper
- Is it going to be worth replacing bat insulation with rigid foam between bedroom and garage
- Most efficient way to improve the house’s heating
Best Answer
The answer is it matters, barely.
Beyond R25 in most climates has very very diminishing returns. Having air seal to the house and air flow in the attic is way more important than adding more insulation.
I don't want to get into a diatribe but thermal mass (think weight of your building) is a much better indicator of energy savings than insulation. Adding insulation on normal wood framed homes allows heat (or cold) to store in the insulation thereby negating the effectiveness beyond the "blocking".
You can use a calculator to do the numbers and for a 1000 sq ft house you are looking at around $7-10 a year... and remember this calculator does not account for the mass of your home (or lack of) and it is actually created by the insulation industry - so they are going to use the lab numbers that suit them best.
When insulating your attic - taking other things out - there are three main things:
Look at the picture below. Once you get to the "R40ish" stage, yes more is better, but does it have any sort of lasting effect? No.