A little is known about the author of this book.
I was asked to find the error in the sentence above. I thought there is no error in the sentence and told the same. But a few people are insisting that a little is incorrect. It should be replaced with little since it has negative connotation.
I couldn't understand how they can say it has negative connotation without further context.
I believe the sentence above is correct grammatically but has different meaning from the sentence with little.
Am I wrong? Did you find the sentence ungrammatical? Can you please clarify?
Best Answer
Both examples are technically grammatical:
However, the second sentence is much more idiomatic and likely to be said. Little is known about X is a common way to phrase things, but the version with a little is not commonly said, so it's not really surprising that people would consider it a mistake.
People tend to expect things to fit the patterns they're used to hearing, and if you say something that almost fits a pattern they know, they're likely to think you made a mistake. If they heard sentence 1, they'd probably think you meant to say sentence 2, even if both versions are technically grammatical.
Both a little and little are quantifiers which express small numbers. So what's the difference?
As a negator, little licenses negative polarity items:
This would be ungrammatical with a little, which is positive:
The same is true of a few (positive paucal quantifier) and few (approximate negative quantifier).
Notes:
1 From Latin paucus 'few; little', indicating a relatively small number.