I suggest the phrasal verb storm off, which encompasses the idea of leaving with anger. I find the use of lope to be at odds with the need for anger in the motion, since a lope is "a long, easy stride; a leisurely canter"; ease and leisureliness are not compatible with anger.
As StoneyB says, I don't think you can get everything all into one word or even one phrasal verb; you will need additional description for the part where others are treated disrespectfully. Other options for that portion could be elbowing people aside, barreling through the crowd, or even heedless of the people in his way.
I think love interests or romantic interests could work, given OP's latest context.
From tvtropes.org,
Love Interest
The princess to be rescued, or the Prince Charming to sweep the heroine off her feet. Or just someone that happens to become romantically involved.
It's a Super Trope so universal, that there are too many specific examples to list. There are a few in the list below.
The list includes Girl Next Door, Girl of My Dreams, and Hello, Nurse!.
When applied to real life, I think love interest is just as flexible. A love interest is basically a person that you are romantically interested in. This could range from something small, like going on a few dates, to something big, like love and marriage.
A romantic interest is similar to a love interest, with the possible nuance that a romantic interest concerns more casual relationships.
I wasn't able to find any reputable dictionary sources, so I imagine that the definitions vary from one person's opinion to another. However, if you call these girls your love interests, I think people will get the point that you are interested in them romantically or that you pursuing them romantically to some degree as described above.
By the way, you could also say that you are interested in these girls, or into them. They mean that you have a some kind of romantic interest in them, though it suggests a casual one. I don't think it would include "loving" someone, unless it's unrequited love.
Best Answer
"Enableable" is possible, but it's not a common word and it's a little difficult to pronounce.
If essential to the idea is that something is not presently enabled but can be enabled, I think I would use a phrase, like "can be enabled". Depending on the context, you might simply use a totally different word, like say the thing is "available".
Afterthought
People on here often ask, "What is one word that means ..." Often the correct answer is, "There is no one word that conveys that meaning. You have to use more than one word." While of course it's convenient if there is one short, simple word that expresses an idea, I'd say, Don't be afraid to use multiple words. A single word is not always better. Sometimes there is a single word, but the word is rarely used so most of your readers won't know it and will have to guess what it means. (In theory they could look it up in a dictionary, but for most that would be way too much effort.) Or it could be difficult to pronounce or awkward for some other reason.
The only reason I can see to insist on a single word is if you are using it over and over again in a document. If you're going to say it once or twice, using several words should be no problem. If you're going to say it a hundred times and it takes ten words to express the idea, then yes, this can get verbose and repetitive. In that case, I'd say okay, use an obscure word, or invent a word, or attach a specific meaning to a word that ALMOST means what you want. Then explain it once and use it many times. Like, "In this users guide, when we say that a feature is 'available', we mean that it can be enabled from the User Options menu ..."