Learn English – Active to Passive voice

active-voicepassive-voice

Active:

My mother will be washing my clothes.

Passive:

My clothes will be being washed by my mother.

Is this correct? It feels very odd to use 'be being' together like this.

Best Answer

If you want to retain the future continuous in the passive transformation, you can use "getting" instead of "being":

My clothes will be getting washed by my mother.

"will be being" is a combination a speaker of American English is not likely to hear in a lifetime.

Converting from active to passive

What you'll need:

one active clause with
- a real subject¹
- an object (lexically rendered, if applicable)

Instructions

Sample active clause:

The poor girls' parents marry them off at a young age.

Subject: The poor girls' parents
Object: them (lexically rendered: the poor girls)
Verb: marry off
Circumstance: at a young age
1. The verb is put into the passive. This is done by:
2. Adding the appropriate form of be in front of the verb
3. Putting the verb into the past tense
  - passive verb: are married off
4. The original Object becomes the new Subject.
  - new Subject: the poor girls
5. (Optionally) The original Subject becomes the new Object.
  By must be added in front of it.
  - new Object: by the poor girls' or their parents
6. Any adjuncts (for instance, circumstances that apply to the entire sentence) can be re-added.

The poor girls are married off by their parents at a young age.

Alternately, you can omit the new Object, the Circumstance, or both, if you wish to change the information conveyed in the new sentence:

The poor girls are married off at a young age.

The parents are not longer portrayed as the agents of the verb.

The poor girls are married off.

The age of the girls are no longer conveyed.

The poor girls are married off by their parents.

The parents are still the age, but their age is no longer conveyed.

An interesting case: ditransitive verbs

I read him the book (present tense)

Subject: I
Object₁ (indirect): (to) him
Object₂ (direct): the book
Verb: read

Passivisation options:

Object₁-oriented:

He was read the book (by me).

Object₂-oriented:

The book was read to him (by me).
The book was read (by me).

Note

In the case of ditransitive clauses, the direct object must be present in the passive clause:

He was read by me.

While this is technically grammatical, it doesn't have the same meaning as the Active clause, as the Active clause would now be:

I read him.

Converting from passive to active

The same thing, but in reverse:

The verb is restored to the tense that be is in
Remove the form of be adjacent to the verb
The Object becomes the new Subject
The Subject becomes the new Object

Handling cases where there is no Object in the passive

Of course, you can omit most Objects in the passive, with the exception for ditransitive verbs outlined above.

He was read the book.

Unfortunately, without more context, you can't recover the original Subject. This is a case where the writer/speaker, has (deliberately or not) omitted the original Subject (the Agent). This can be done for many reasons, for instance to lie by omission, or in the case where the person is unaware of the Agent.

Why convert to passive?

There are many reasons to convert to passive:

You don't know what/who the agent/Subject was in the active: you can omit it in the passive.
You don't want to say what/who the agent/Subject was in the active: you can omit it in the passive.
You want to foreground/emphasise one of the Objects rather than the Subject.
You want to background/underplay the Subject/agent

In fact, linguistically, the process of changing the grammatical roles from Subject to Object and Object to Subject is called demotion and promotion, respectively.

¹ I say a real subject, because relational, existential, and meteorological clauses, which technically have subjects can't be passivised.

He is the Pope.
It is raining.
There is a dog.

Passivisations:

The Pope is/was him/he.
Raining is/was it.
A dog is/was there.

While The Pope is him/he is grammatical, it isn't really passivisation.

Interestingly, putting attributive clauses into the past tense can give them a passive-like construction.

The door was opened.

This is a much larger can of worms, and it depends largely on the context as to whether it is a passivised clause or just an adjectival usage.

Learn English – Changing “The money was stolen” into active voice

There are two types of passive clause:

Short passive

The money was stolen.
Long passive

The money was stolen by a short man wearing six jackets.

Most passives are short. They don't contain by-phrases.

Only long passives have corresponding active clauses:

Short passive

Passive: The money was stolen.
Active:　*Stole the money.　

The active clause is ungrammatical. It needs a subject, but it doesn't have one.
Long passive

Passive: The money was stolen by a short man wearing six jackets.
Active:　A short man wearing six jackets stole the money.

This active clause is fine. It needs a subject, and it has one.

Your example is a short passive, so it has no direct active clause equivalent. If you want to make it into an active clause, you'll need to add a by-phrase, turning it into a long passive.

You'll have to rely on context to figure out what by-phrase works in your clause, if any.

In this answer, the * symbol marks a sentence as ungrammatical. For more information about passives, see A Student's Introduction to English Grammar (2005), chapter 15.