I would love to have seen her.
How often would you use such a construction–that is, I am wondering if it is a formal structure?
In addition, could you show me some other way to express the same meaning?
Many thanks
modal-verbspast-tenseverbs
I would love to have seen her.
How often would you use such a construction–that is, I am wondering if it is a formal structure?
In addition, could you show me some other way to express the same meaning?
Many thanks
Best Answer
This construction with the perfect infinitive is regular and idiomatic.
The past-form modal would expresses some sort of ‘unreality’, but exactly what sort and in what degree can only be inferred from the context. With an infinitive complement would love usually signifies a great wish or hope (greater than mere would like) for some future event; the particular ‘unreality’ in play might be a matter of
But with a perfect infinitive like to have seen the sense is somewhat different. The perfect, HAVE seen, names an event prior to the time you are speaking of, not a future event. That event is the origin of some state at the time you are speaking of. With like or love the prior event will ordinarily be the cause of your present state of happiness:
This, however, employs a perfect gerund (-ing form), not a perfect infinitive. In theory you could substitute an infinitive for the gerund (I love having seen her → I love to have seen her), but the perfect infinitive is very rare with the ‘real’ I love. (I find only 27 instances on Google, and none in either Google Books or COCA.) By contrast, the perfect infinitive is standard, and the perfect gerund very rare, with ‘unreal’ I would love. The ‘unreality’ expressed here is almost always counterfactuality:
Here the two senses, ‘source of happiness’ and ‘wish’ flow together:
The time reference in this construction can be a little quirky. Ordinarily the event which did not occur is one which you hoped would take place in the past:
But it can also refer to a future event which in the past appeared to be possible but is now known to be impossible: