What is the difference between using IN or WITH in the sentences below?
-
He broke the thick sheet of glass IN/WITH one hit.
-
Everyone was surprised that he won the fight IN/WITH one punch.
Additionally, I would like to know the specific definition of IN in these sentences. Using WITH would denotes "by means of", which fits its usage above. However, I can't find a dictionary entry that closely matches the usage of IN in the same context. Any links you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.
Best Answer
Just to put Davo's answer in as an answer, with a little more explanation...
In terms of the most essential meaning in this context, "in" and "with" have the same meaning. They both introduce adverbials indicating what it took to do what was done. "He broke the thick sheet of glass" stands as a sentence on its own, but is modified by the adverbial of manner "in one hit" or "with one hit". Both "in" and "with" can have other meanings, but here they introduce the same sort of adverbial. Adverbials of manner tell you how or in what way something is done.
However, as Davo notes, they carry different shades of meaning. "With" is more neutral than "in", as with would be more likely to be used if there is no surprise, and in makes it seem more remarkable. You can also indicate that you consider it remarkable by adding the word "just" - "in just one hit".