She doesn't have any experience loving someone.
She doesn't have any experience with loving someone.
She doesn't have any experience in loving someone.
Are all the above sentences grammatically correct?
What's the difference in their meaning?
Is it necessary to use a preposition after the word "Experience" .
Best Answer
I think to answer this question, we need to distinguish between two different senses of experience. I quote from LDOCE:
In this sense we can use of/in/with after experience to make noun phrases or gerund as in
in is often followed by a gerund. However noun phrases are also possible. 'Experience in' implies the person has been (professionally) trained in something (a special field of activity) as in
and after 'of', we mainly use gerund unless the word 'experience' is preceded by get/gain as in
And afer with we tend to use noun phrases (persons/animals) and it implies that the knowledge has been gained about something by actual physical contact as in
Let's say this is said by a sister who raised his brother while his mom was always away working.
In this sense we use of/with/for (Not in) after experience to make noun phrases as in
In this sense, I think you can use both with and of interchangeably to make the same meaning as in
I assume you try to refer to loving someone simply as an event, or type of event, lived through which does not have the idea of gained knowledge. So, I think sentence two is the safest choice here. About number one (experience doing something) I found no reference to back it up so I think it's better to be avoided at least when formality matters. Many think of it as acceptable though as in