Learn English – “had gone” vs “was gone” vs “did go” vs “was going”

passive-voicepast-perfectpast-tensetag-questions

I have have a hard time to understand the differences. Would you please explain the differences?

Question:

You went to Chile, didn't you?

Answer:

  1. No, but I had gone to Peru, which is right next door.
  2. No, but I was gone to Peru, which is right next door.
  3. No, but I did go to Peru, which is right next door.
  4. No, but I was going Peru, which is right next door.

Best Answer

I think we can answer the question by ruling out the incorrect options.

  1. I had gone to Peru, which is right next door.

This sentence is in past perfect tense. Past perfect is used to avoid ambiguity when we mention two events that happened in the past. We use the past perfect for the earlier event. However, in many cases the chronological order is obvious; then we can use the simple past tense without causing any ambiguity.

  1. I was gone to Peru, which is right next door.

Here, "gone" is an adjective. At the first glance I confused it with a passive structure, but the verb "go" is an intransitive verb. By the way, the adjective "gone" describes "leaving a place". Therefore, it does not make sense in this context.

  1. I did go to Peru, which is right next door.

I think this sentence does not have a serious problem in terms of using tenses.

  1. I was going Peru, which is right next door.

In this sentence we have the past progressive (or continuous) tense. Progressive aspects are used to talk about a process. "I was going to Peru" implies that you were in the middle of your trip, for example somewhere between Peru and the location where you started your journey.


Therefore, as a learner, I would choose the third answer among those four options.