There is no universally accepted list of parts of speech for English. The most traditional list is probably the one you've cited (noun, adjective, pronoun, verb, adverb, preposition, conjunction and interjection), though some would add articles or numerals or both. The term "particle" has no fixed meaning.
Quirk et al. (A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language) list ten word classes (preposition, pronoun, determiner, conjunction, modal verb, primary verb, full verb, noun, adjective, adverb) plus two "lesser categories" (numerals and interjections) and "a small number of words of unique function" (e.g. the negative particle not and the infinitive marker to).
Huddleston and Pullum (The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language) list nine lexical categories or parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, adverb, preposition, determinative, subordinator, coordinator, interjection).
So, whereas traditional grammar recognises "some" and "any" as adjectives or pronouns, Quirk et al. classify them as "determiners" (along with articles and numerals), while Huddleston and Pullum regard them as "determinatives". And whereas traditional grammar (and Quirk) recognise "conjunctions", Huddleston and Pullum divide them into "subordinators" and "coordinators" (and also reclassify many words traditionally called conjunctions as prepositions). And while traditional grammar (and Huddleston and Pullum) regard verbs as a single class, Quirk et al. regard them as three separate parts of speech (modal verbs, primary verbs, and full verbs). Finally, whereas traditionalists distinguish pronouns from nouns, H&P regard pronouns as a subclass of nouns (although some traditional pronouns are classed as determinatives).
To answer your questions:
1) words a, an, the (all people know very well they are articles);
They are indeed articles, but this doesn't necessarily mean they are a separate part of speech. The ancient Greeks in fact considered them as such, but many traditional grammarians (following the Romans, whose language lacked articles) have simply treated them as a subclass of adjectives. To this day, some dictionaries put "adj." next to these words.
Modern scholarship regards the articles as a subclass of determiners/determinatives.
2) words like "one", "two", "seven", "eighty" etc. (I consider them numerals);
They are numerals, but that does not necessarily mean they are a separate part of speech - though Quirk et al. specify them as a "minor" word class. Some traditionalists would regard them as adjectives and pronouns. Many people would regard them as a subclass of determiners/determinatives.
3) words like "even" (even John likes apples), "only" (only you can do this job), "just". Are they particles? If not, what part of speech are they?
The OED offers two definitions of "particles": one is that of a minor function word that can't be inflected, and the other is that of adverbs or prepositions used as part of a phrasal verb. By the first definition, they could be considered particles, but most English grammars don't specify particles as a distinct word class. In the dictionaries, "even", "only", "just" are adjectives and adverbs (the latter in your examples).
Best Answer
Grammar
The Subject of the sentence is the pronoun "I". The Predicate is:
The Head of the verb phrase is the word don't, which is contraction of the dummy auxiliary verb do and the negative particle not. This takes as its Complement the verb phrase:
The Head of this verb phrase is the verb want. The word want takes as its Complement the infinitival clause:
The Head of his phrase, depending on your grammar, is probably the verb know (some writers would argue the Head is the word to). The word to in this case is a subordinator which marks know how you did it as subordinate. The verb know takes as its Complement the interrogative finite clause:
The Subject of this clause is the pronoun you. The Head of the clause is the verb did. The Direct Object is the pronoun it. The clause has an Adjunct, the interrogative adverb how, which has been fronted to the beginning of the clause.
The verb want is a control verb. This means that if there is no expressed Subject of the following infinitive clause, we understand the Subject of want to be the Subject of the following infinitive. So the sentence can be interpreted like this:
Meaning
Suppose the listener has done something. Maybe they stole some jewels from a museum and nobody caught them. To do something like this, the listener would need to use some kind of plan or method. This is what is expressed by:
The word how refers to the method used. The speaker is telling the listener "I do not want to know the method!". Of course we don't know what the listener actually did. It might be something quite boring.