From the following sentences, which one is more grammatically correct?
- Carbohydrates in diet need less amount of water in comparison to proteins and fats.
- Carbohydrates in diet need lesser amount of water in comparison to proteins and fats
I personally think the second one should be correct because we are comparing carbohydrates to fats and proteins.
Best Answer
Neither is quite right. In general, you would probably want to say either
or
At a stretch, you might possibly say
but it sounds less idiomatic than the other two options.
You've hit upon a rather tricky part of English, the usage of less vs lesser vs smaller. In general, you can compare uncountable or mass nouns (like water) using the word less:
You use smaller to compare countable nouns:
In your sentence, you have the countable, compound noun [an] amount of water. Because it is countable, you need to have an article in there, and you need to use the comparative term smaller:
Alternatively, you could drop the phrase [an] amount and have just the mass/uncountable noun water (which doesn't need an article), in which case you would use the term less for comparison:
So why not lesser?
Lesser is a more specialized case. For one thing, it can only be used attributively (right before a noun), and only with count nouns. When we use it comparatively, it most often refers to quality or importance rather than quantity:
It can be used to refer to quantity, but only with a few specialized count nouns of amount or quantity:
However, while all of these are to some extent grammatical, only the first sounds fully idiomatic to my ear; for the rest, I would prefer to replace lesser with smaller. An Ngram comparing usage suggests this trend is widespread:
1 The word diet is countable, so it needs an article here. You could also use a possessive pronoun: Carbohydrates in your diet.
So while you could use it, smaller probably sounds better.