Learn English – “It was broken” vs “It got broken”

grammarsentence-meaningverb usageverb-formsverbs

  1. When we say "The glass was broken" it means when we looked at it, it had been broken before, that is, it shows a state that could be spread over a period of time.
    But when we say "it got broken" it shows a happening at a particular point of time.
  2. But that is not true for the verb "bear". When it changes to passive form, it won't be a state, but a happening. When I say "I was born in 1990" it dosn't show a state, but a happening at a point of time. So I wouldn't need to say "I got born in 1990."

What's the difference between these 2 verbs "1.break" and "2. bear"?

These have the same structure above, but different meaning in passive forms using be verbs. One shows a state and the other shows a happening.

Best Answer

This is a case of English treating "broken" like an adjective. Actually, "broken" can be used either to describe a specific event (in which case broken is a verb), or to describe a state.

  • The glass was broken (meaning it has been broken for a while). (This is the imperfect past tense of "to be", plus the adjective "born", no different from "the glass was green").
  • The glass was broken at 7:43pm yesterday when it fell off the table. (This is the passive perfect past tense of the verb "to bear"; "born" is a participle in this case, no different from "the glass was purchased at 7:43pm").

By comparison, "born" cannot be used as an adjective because it is by definition a specific instant in time (at least as it is used in English). So, when you say "he was born", there is no possibility that you mean to say "he has been born for a long time"--that doesn't mean anything in English. It is assumed that "he was born" is a past tense perfect verb and not an adjective used with the past tense imperfect of the verb "to be".

Note: The phrase "it got broken" is not correct in written English, although you might see it used colloquially.

Related Topic