Pronunciation – Difference Between ‘Wore’ and ‘Were’

pronunciationvowels

'Were' and 'wore' sound the same to me.

Is it true at native english users' ears?

from dictionary: [wɔ:r] for wore and [wə́:r] for were

Best Answer

No, they do not sound the same to native speakers. There's a striking difference between 'were' and 'wore'.

British English

Were: In British English, 'were' in its strong form (or slow speech) is pronounced with the open-mid central unrounded vowel /ɜː/. In its weak form, it's pronounced with a schwa /ə/.

Wore: It's pronounced with the open-mid back rounded vowel /ɔː/ (rhymes with war, sore, law).

Note that in Southern British English, they're pronounced without the /r/ sound because British English is non-rhotic.


American English

Were is pronounced with an r-coloured (rhotacised) vowel1: with /ɝ/ in its strong form and /ɚ/ in its weak form. (The rhotacised versions of central vowels are more common than others.)

Wore is pronounced with the open-mid back rounded vowel /ɔ/ followed by the consonant /ɹ/

Another important difference is that of vowel roundedness; the vowel in wore is rounded while that of were isn't.


  1. I've explained the vowel chart and the difference between /ɝ/ and /ɜ/ in the linked answer.