Learn English – “page has not updated” or “page has not been updated”
headlinesepassive-voicetense
Which one is correct?
page has not updated
or
page has not been updated.
Best Answer
There are slight nuances to the different words. Both implicitly place "blame" and the nuance indicates where.
The page has not updated.
This places the "blame" on the page or the system itself. It's pretty neutral. "Oh! the page hasn't updated. We've done what we ought, but the page hasn't kept up."
The page has not been updated.
This places the "blame" on the content administrator. It is a little more apologetic. "Oh! we didn't update this page. It might be that we don't have anything new to say or we just weren't able to get around to it."
Which makes more sense? In the future, this would be a better fit for the UX SE site
All sentences seem to be gramatically correct. There may be differences in what they convey and in what circumstances each one would be used. The contest for this question is missing, so it's hard to tell which one is the best.
"Have not been started yet", using persent perfect in passive voice, is useful when you emphasize the present state of things connected to the past (the courses were announced in the past, but not started yet at present), and imply that someone should actively start the courses.
"Are not being started" uses passive voice and present simple. It suggests someone should do some action to start the course, but does not link to anything in the past.
"Are not started yet" uses "started" as an adjective; it does not refer to the past, nor suggest that someone is supposed to do something.
It is categorized as Modal verbs.
If you are hesitated to use either has or have, Modal verbs are always follow by have. You can find more information about its usage with "have" here.
Best Answer
There are slight nuances to the different words. Both implicitly place "blame" and the nuance indicates where.
This places the "blame" on the page or the system itself. It's pretty neutral. "Oh! the page hasn't updated. We've done what we ought, but the page hasn't kept up."
This places the "blame" on the content administrator. It is a little more apologetic. "Oh! we didn't update this page. It might be that we don't have anything new to say or we just weren't able to get around to it."
Which makes more sense? In the future, this would be a better fit for the UX SE site