Learn English – Present Continuous vs. Present Simple

present-continuouspresent-simple

My thought process:

  1. We all know that progressive tenses are, to put it simply, used to talk about an action in progress:
  • I'm having a dinner at 2:00. (eating dinner is in progress at 2:00)

  • I was having a dinner at 2:00. (eating dinner was in progress at 2:00)

  • I will be having a dinner at 2:00. (eating dinner will be in progress at 2:00)

  1. Simple tenses are used to say when an action starts.
  • I have my dinner at 2:00. (My dinner starts at 2:00)

  • I had my dinner at 2:00. (My dinner started at 2:00)

  • I will have my dinner at 2:00. (My dinner will start at 2:00)

That seems logical to me. Let's go further.

  1. In many books you can find the following explanation for "present progressive for future":

We usually use the present continuous tense for future arrangements.

e.g.

  • I'm seeing my friend tomorrow.

OK, I understand the rules so far. It is a future event that has been arranged. Perhaps I have called my friend and we agreed on meeting sometime tomorrow.

4.Now this is the part that I don't understand:

  • I'm seeing my friend at 2:00 tomorrow.

I am totally lost here.

As present continuous is used to talk about future arrangements, in the sentence above I need to use the present continuous. If I change the tense to the present simple (which is used to talk about future events that are scheduled) it will change the meaning of what I am going to say. It will sound like a timetable or like a schedule, which the sentence above is not – it's just an arrangement I made with a friend of mine.

However, as the present continuous is used to talk about actions in progress, does the sentence I'm seeing my friend at 2:00 tomorrow. mean that my appointment will be in progress at 2:00 or will start at 2:00?

A very important question: What do you feel would be the best way to express a future arrangement that starts at a certain time in future?

Best Answer

Your initial examples are not as unambiguous as you think, and that is probably leading to later confusion. The continuous effect is not as baked in as you make it out to be.

"I'm having dinner at 2:00" actually sounds like dinner is scheduled to start at 2:00.

"I was having dinner at 2:00" could it was ongoing in the past at 2:00, or the 'was' could be subjunctive introducing doubt, meaning plans were changed ("I was having dinner at 2:00, but I missed the bus so we ate at 3:00"). Or even just that plans have been cast into doubt (eg "I was going to Toshi Station to pick up some power converters" -L. Skywalker)

"I will be having dinner at 2:00" could be grammatically be either ongoing or a scheduled start.

Your simple tense examples mostly work, although "I have my dinner at 2:00" sounds like it means "I have dinner at 2:00 every day" more normal usage for a specific upcoming event is "I will have dinner at 2:00"

Anyway, the main point is that the 'ongoing nature' isn't as firm a rule as you are looking for. So that's why there's nothing broken about "I'm having dinner at 2:00 tomorrow" with 2:00 being the start time.

Related Topic