I'd like to know the difference between the two verbs since they seem to have the same meaning. When should I use await, and when wait?
Learn English – the difference between “wait” and “await”
differenceverbs
Related Solutions
You would not say that you merge the colors.
You also would not say that you mix into traffic.
I am not actually sure why, a quick dictionary search didn't make it clearer.
But I think you merge things when they keep their general form or configuration but blend together... where as you mix things when they get all out of order in the process.
Like with a deck of cards - merging two halves of the decks (shuffling -- we never actually say 'merge' about cards) -- mixing would be like dumping all the cards on the table and spreading them around with your hands.
Merge is less commonly used, btw - The two rivers merged into one, We merged the two businesses, there was an accident where the express lane merges into traffic.
The two words have overlapping meanings, so there are contexts where either one could be used. However, there are certain constructs where one would be regarded as much better than the other.
I'm not sure if I can provide an exhaustive list of contexts where you should use might instead of could, or vice versa. Let's start with the example you provided, which is when either word is followed by not.
The phrase might not indicates a possibility that the contrary could happen. The word cannot suggests that the contrary won't happen. And the phrase could not suggests that the contrary wasn't able to happen.
So:
He might not show up.
means that he might show up, but we're starting to think he may not, while:
He could not show up.
suggests that, because of some obstacle, he was not able to make it.
Let's say we're supposed to meet Mike at 8 o'clock, and it's now 8:20. We have no idea where Mike is. I might say:
Let's not wait any longer. He might not turn up.
However, just before I finish my sentence, my cell phone rings. It's Mike! Mike tells me that his flight is delayed; the airplane is having mechanical problems, they haven't even left the runway yet. Mike is 500 miles away. Now, I say:
Let's not wait any longer. He cannot be here; he's stuck in Memphis.
Next, my friend and I leave, and we go to Ted's house. Ted sees that Mike his missing, and asks, "Wasn't Mike coming with you guys?" I might reply:
We waited for him, but he could not be here. His flight got delayed.
This is because, while might infers a possibility, could can infer a possibility, or an ability. Let's say you set a bar a meter off the ground, and ask me if I'm able to jump over it without touching it. I could say:
I might be able to do that. (it's possible)
But now you raise the bar two meters off the ground, and ask me if I can jump over it. I might say:
There is no way I could do that. (it's impossible)
However, there are times when the words could be used interchangeably, as you have sensed. For example, let's say we're leaving the house for a few days, and we're trying to decide whether or not to leave the furnace on. I might say:
Let's make sure the furnace gets turned on before we leave. We might get some cold weather.
or:
Let's make sure the furnace gets turned on before we leave. We could get some cold weather.
In that context, the two phrases mean essentially the same thing.
Now, an interesting example for the advanced reader. Consider these two statements:
The repairman might come today, but he could come tomorrow.
The repairman could come today, but he might come tomorrow.
Is there a difference? I'd say that both of them mean that the repairman is supposed to come either today or tomorrow, although there's a little uncertainty as to which day he will arrive. But does one of them suggest a higher probability one way or the other? I don't think so, at least not reliably.
Best Answer
Wait is an intransitive verb—it doesn't take a direct object; consequently it can't be cast into passive voice, and its past participle can't act as an adjective:
Await is a transitive verb—it does take a direct object.
Wait for may be treated as a transitive phrasal verb.
But it is not ordinarily used in the passive voice. These are grammatically acceptable but sound a little odd.
✲ marks a usage as unacceptable ? marks a usage as questionably acceptable