It's not common enough to be an idiom, but I've heard the expression, "getting paid to eat ice cream", though only in the first person and only concerning employment. So,
"Did you hear? I've been offered a field job!"
"You always did like travel."
"I know, right? I'm getting paid to eat ice cream."
The origin may be a quote from musician Bob McQuillen, the biography of whom is titled "Paid to Eat Ice Cream", after something he said about being a professional musician.
You know, it sounds like your language has a very handy idiom there, for which there's no direct English correspondence. English being what it is, if you shared the literal translation, it might rapidly become an English idiom.
Short answer
to withdraw from a situation or to quit participating in a project or task, etc., and to thereby cause a negative consequence for someone.
Longer answer
We often use verbs (including phrasal verbs which this could be considered) followed by "on" to add a meaning something like "blamefully causing a negative consequence for someone or something."
For example, "She went crazy on me." Would generally mean that I was depending on her company or assistance with something, so her going crazy caused me some problem or distress.
To pull out means to depart (especially by vehicle, which I assume comes from carriages or coaches being pulled by horses, for example) or to withdraw:
pull out
- To leave or depart: The train pulls out at noon.
- To withdraw, as from a situation or commitment: After the crash, many Wall Street investors pulled out.
Since the first definition means a vehicle leaving, it would not normally be followed by on unless it meant on time or on a surface: The car pulled out on/onto the dusty road.
We can guess that it's more likely you ask about pull out on with respect to definition 2, because the three words seem to go together and in a way such that the meaning would be less obvious to many English learners.
So, to pull out on someone in this sense likely means to withdraw from a situation or to quit a project or task, etc., and to thereby cause a negative consequence for someone.
Examples:
She promised to invest $2 million in our company. We spent weeks preparing plans and drafting legal agreements in preparation for that. Then she pulled out on us at the last minute. We were so disappointed.
They were engaged for three years. Then John pulled out on her on the wedding day. He just left town without telling anyone.
He promised to help me move all of my things to my new apartment, but then he called and pulled out on me, saying he was too tired from work.
Best Answer
I agree with @TRomano that to address someone, we use "to."
However, there is also a special case when you're also correct and "with + object" is used to mean "to understand."
For example, when a singer at a concert wants to know if the audience is having as good a time as she is, she might say, "Are you with me!"
As TRomano explained, the literal aspect of this is borrowed from "to be a part of a group."
But its figurative aspect can also be applied to mean, "Are we on the same page!", another figurative phrase derived from its literal meaning.
Ya with me on this :D?
PS - There is one more special case of "with + object" that means "to understand."
Are you with it?