Learn English – What are the differences among “make noise”, “make a noise”, “make noises”

I'm afraid the only general distinction is the one you have already named: do = perform and make = create.

But that is no more than a general tendency; as your examples show, in any specific instance either or both may be relevant, and at some point in the history of the language one has earned more favour than the other.

It's often possible to see a reason why one is used rather than the other in a particular situation, and that's useful for remembering which one is used; but it is of no value in predicting which one is used when you encounter a new situation. For instance:

You complete your homework assignments, which included writing down the answers to a series of questions. It seems that should be 'making' your homework, but in fact the proper phrase is doing your homework. You might remember this by considering that sometimes your homework doesn't call for you to 'make' anything: it might be reading a chapter in your textbook. The important thing is you did the tasks that were assigned.

You agree to act as the fourth person in a game of contract bridge. You would think this would call for 'do', since you are performing a role; but in fact you make a fourth. You can remember this by noting that what you are doing is “making” a complete table of players—would that have occurred to you before you encountered the phrase?

There's just no telling. You have to learn the right term case by case.

The difference is in the metaphor within the idiom. Different metaphors create different contexts which create different usages.

End to end conveys a linear sense; a line or length of some sort, and an end to end solution covers the complete range. In software, this phrase would mean a solution that covers each piece involved, from the client interface to the data storage and everything in between. End to end testing is a very common example of this usage in the industry. This idiom has a common and generally well understood meaning.

360 degree suggests a circle, and such a solution would cover every possible angle. This would likely be used to suggest that the software works on every platform: desktop, server, phone, tablet, etc. This is because software is often spoken of as facing a particular platform or audience when supported (e.g. mobile facing, web facing). Alternatively, this could be taken to mean that the software provide any and all desired functions within its domain; users don't have use anything else to do what they need. This term is much more nebulous than end to end and is more likely to be viewed as marketing fluff.

If you have an end to end solution then you've got every necessary step in the pipeline or process covered; nothing is missing or needs to be supplied by a third party. If you have a 360 degree solution, then the solution works in all applicable environments; it covers all the angles and users can access their data from any entry point.

Is there anything like 180-degree solution? Does it make sense in English? Is it an end-to-end solution?

No, this is not a common term (I've never heard it before), and it does not mean the same as end to end. You could use 180 degree solution sarcastically to imply that a proposed 360 degree solution only did things in a half-assed fashion, because 180 degree means that only half of things are covered.