If you tell someone about serious injury, the first thing comes is the physical harm to someone.
OALD defines this word and it is mostly used for physical harm
injury - harm done to a person's or an animal's body, for example in an accident
However, injury can happen to someone's feeling (on the same page).
injury - Damages may be awarded for emotional injury.
In usage note injury OALD defines being injured where instances are of physically being hurt.
Being a medical professional, I'd like to mention that damage can also happen to human organs (especially internal) but then it could be the result of an injury or harm by bad microorganisms
In that road accident, he got several injuries. In fact, his liver is damaged and needs to be repaired. OR
I have never seen such worse septicemia. Her internal organs are damaged and will stop working soon.
But again, if you are talking about someone's reputation or injury in the context of non-living thing, use damage to keep ambiguity at bay.
Don't get confuse that damage can be used for physical harm. 'Physical' can be used for non living things like computers and books etc. :)
So, a ship is a non-living thing so it might sustain damage and let the closer cause damage to the economy, not injury. :)
You lie yourself and you lay something - the very basic thing.
For instance,
You lie down on the floor OVER
You lay a pot on the floor.
This is about the present tense.
I could not find anything better than simply putting GrammarGirl's excellent examples here, in-situ.
The past tense of lie is lay, so...
Last week, Steve lay down on the floor.
The cat lay in the mud after it rained yesterday.
The past tense of lay is laid, so
Last week, I laid the TPS report on your desk.
Mary forcefully laid her ring on the table.
The past participle of lie is lain (this is wonderful), so
Steve has lain on the floor for days.
The cat has lain in the mud for hours.
The past participle of lay is laid, so
I have laid the TPS report on your desk.
Mary has forcefully laid her ring on the table.
Best Answer
shoot & shot are film/movie & professional photographic terms.
shoot describes the 'event' at which film stock is used to make the movie/photographs.
The shoot is a general term for the entire occasion, at which there may be several hundred people, all doing different tasks that make up the event; from catering, locations & logistics, transport, carpenters & riggers, lighting specialists, sound recordists, cameramen & grips [camera movers], production crew, actors, director … all are on the same 'shoot'.
Stills & movie would be differentiated as
photo shoot / stills shoot or
film shoot / movie shoot.
'stills' is the movie term for non-moving pictures.
A stills photographer would call them shots or photographs, as there is no 'moving' alternative to cause confusion.
A shot is either
An aside… this is where we get the term "Who is calling the shots?"
The answer is - the Director.