In my textbook I have this list of irregular verbs:
Infinitive Present Simple Past Simple Past Participle
go go went gone
do do did done
be is was been
be am was been
be are were been
have have had had
will will would would
As can be seen from the table, the present-simple forms of verbs coincide with their infinitives, except in case with the verb "be".
Thus, the infinitive of the present-simple "do" is also "do", and the infinitive of the present-simple "will" is also "will".
I wonder what form of "will" exactly we are dealing with in the following sentence:
These days they will not allow us to walk into that room.
Why? (Please, explain the logic in your answer)
Best Answer
Modal auxiliary verb will has only two forms (setting aside the reduced and negative forms):
the present tense form, will
the preterit form, would
However, will can also be classified as a lexical verb:
The sentences above exemplify the third person singular present tense form, the plain present tense form, and the past participle form, in that order, all of which the modal auxiliary lacks.
All things considered, your will form belongs to either the modal auxiliary, or the lexical verb; that is, it's either a present tense form, or a plain present tense form (because the modal auxiliary lacks the distinction, it has no such thing as a plain present tense form, just a single present tense form, while the lexical verb has both the plain present tense form (will) and the third person singular present tense form (wills)). What's left to determine is whether will is a modal auxiliary or a lexical verb in your sentence:
There are three salient characteristics which can help us classify it:
Primary verb negation, as opposed to non-verbal negation (They went not to Paris but to Berlin) and non-imperative secondary negation (He promised not to help them), is a distinctive property of auxiliary verbs:
Note that such negation can be marked inflectionally with a negative form (again, a distinctive property of auxiliary verbs):
Only bare infinitival complementation, as opposed to a to-infinitival complement (I want to eat dinner), and as opposed to verbs that in addition to an infinitival complement take, e.g., an NP before the plain form (They made us do it – here, us is the NP, and do is the plain form), is a distinctive modal auxiliary characteristic:
No person–subject agreement in the present tense. If we were to alter the sentence slightly, changing the subject to he, we'd get the following:
Now, notice that the form in bold is no different than the one in the original sentence:
If this will were a lexical verb, it would have the third person singular present tense form wills in the first sentence with he as subject (as in Not for gain or glory, not for riches or immortality, but because my God wills it and that makes it right.).
Therefore, in the original sentence, will is the present tense form.
I have noticed that you're interested in how you would know whether a verb has the so-called "infinitive" form.
First of all, the authors of CGEL, the modern reference grammar mentioned below, propose a unified term, the plain form, dispensing with seemingly separate terms which in reality describe completely identical forms in the following constructions:
In other words, a single verb-form is used in Present-day English in these three constructions as there's "never any morphological difference between the form[s] a verb has [in them]".
So, now that we've gotten rid of the misleading and unnecessary term infinitive, we can begin to talk about whether a verb has the so-called plain form.
This is fairly easy to see because what we can do is try to force the verb into one of the above constructions, where its plain form would be required, and see how it behaves. If it fits (i.e., if the resulting sentence is grammatical), we can say it has that form.
I'll borrow the examples CGEL already provides for the modal auxiliary can:
Constructions above require the plain form (the to-infinitival, bare infinitival, and imperative constructions respectively). Because they're all ungrammatical, we can conclude that the modal auxiliary will does not have the plain form.
For further information see The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language by Huddleston, Pullum, et al. (2002).