I am writing case studies and stuck with this:
The client was from the IT field and …
The problem with this is should I use 'was' or 'is'.
Now, the client's status as on today is also the same, but when I am writing this case study, it should mention the client's status when we had this project on the floor. In other words, case studies are always in past because you're describing something that happened then. But, as far as the status or background is concerned it is the fact even today.
So, should we use past or present tense in such cases?
Best Answer
Consider a situation where you called on Tom at his home. The following day, you can say to a mutual acquaintance
In this context, it is neutral about where Tom is now. He could be still at home: he could be somewhere else.
Now suppose that, when you were at Tom's house, you asked him where he came from, and he replied
When you tell your mutual acquaintance, you say to him
You can use is because Tom is definitely still from London.
Similarly, when you interview your client, you might get these answers:
When you are writing up your report a few months later, you would be obliged to say
I am not suggesting that you should always switch between present and past like this: it is just an example that shows how you can express these ideas precisely if required.
If it's not necessary to be precise and you have multiple items of information, it's probably best to stick to whichever is the most common of present or past: the context will usually be enough to avoid misunderstanding.
If precision is important, it depends exactly what you mean by "from the IT field". If it means "His training is in IT", then it's still true, so you should use is. If it means "He is currently working in IT", you should use was.