A rule of thumb for this is that a "how" question addresses a topic with more specificity than a "what, like" question.
If I just escaped from prison and hitch-hiked a ride out of town, the driver might ask me "What is prison like?"
, meaning he would like a general description of prison. If he asked me "How was Prison?"
, then he is interested in my particular experience in the pen.
Generally, I would say using the "how" is the safer approach in most cases when you are asking about something specific. "How were your clothes after it rained?
(Soaked!) and How is the new car?
(Super-fast!) are both totally acceptable. Using "what.. like" will also get you by in some cases. "What were your clothes like after it rained?"
is passable. "What is the new car like?"
might invoke a weird or sarcastic response "Like a tiger beetle on wheels"
. It is still passable, but it might sound funny to certain people.
Another thing to consider is that a "How" question demands a description of the subject.
"What was it like" invites the responder to draw a comparison to something familiar to the asker.
For example "How was India?"
and "What was India like?"
could possibly (though not necessarily) invite different responses.
The first might be responded to with "beautiful, but very hot and humid", while the second might provoke a more comparative description. "It reminded me of Egypt, but more humid."
I am open to correction, but I hope this helped.
The key to successful business development in this industry is understanding the market from a regional perspective as Canada is a large country with different local dynamics.
successful business development is an unspecific activity, so no article is used.
regional perspective is one of several possible perspectives (views), so I would use a.
dynamics is plural, so no article.
The proof of their success is evident in acquisition interest by larger players and ongoing creation of smaller companies by their former employees.
interest here would be one of several "interests", or "interest" in general. So optional article use here.
larger players and smaller companies are plural so no article.
Best Answer
Short answer
If an adjective is being modified by a deictic degree adverb such as so, too, as, this or that then the adjective and adverb must go before, not after, the indefinite article. They can also appear as a postmodifier after the noun:
Full answer
There are several grammatical points about this construction. Firstly, note that the adjective precedes the article here. The adjective is modifying a whole noun phrase, not a nominal (a nominal is just the smaller phrase within a noun phrase that occurs after the determiners or articles). So we see:
and not:
Secondly you will have noticed that this adjective is itself modified by an adverb. Now this adverb must (a) be an adverb of degree and (b) must be a deictic word, in other words it is understood by reference to the immediate environment of the speaker, or through some other element of the discourse itself. Simply using a normal degree adverb will not work here:
The adverbs that can be used like this are so, too, as, this, that as well as how. Some grammarians have also included more, less and enough in this list, but the grammar of these adverbs is in fact significantly different. Notice that this and that are adverbs here, not determiners.
The adverbs so, too, as, how, this, that and how are degree adverbs that cannot themselves give us any idea of actual degree or extent involved. We could think of them as a kind of 'pro - degree adverb'. These adverbs require some kind of benchmark for us to appreciate the actual degree involved. If this information is not provided by the context this normally entails there being a Complement phrase which indicates the actual extent or degree involved. We can consider such sentences in this way:
Here (X) represents the degree involved. On its own (X) does not tell us the actual degree of the bigness of the problem. It is the clause in brackets which explains the actual extent of the size of the problem.
The adverb involved will dictate what kind of phrase or clause can function as the Complement. The adverb so can take preposition phrases headed by the preposition as or finite clauses typically using the subordinator that. In the sentence above the only possible adverb we could use instead of (X) is the adverb so.
The adverb as typically takes phrases headed by as. It cannot take clauses headed by that.
The adverb too takes to-infinitival clauses, headed by for if they include a Subject:
The preposition as (as opposed to the degree adverb) introduces equality with what follows it. More precisely it indicates some kind of benchmark which is met or exceeded.
Notice that the deictic degree adverbs this, that and how usually don't require a following phrase to provide the benchmark. It is normally clear from the discourse itself. However that sometimes takes finite clauses with that to provide a benchmark when it isn't available from the discourse:
Lastly, when how is interrogative as opposed to exclamative then it is not deictic - in the sense that the degree expressed is left unresolved and in direct questions may be expected to be supplied by the respondent:
Notice that we cannot generally put adjectives before articles, the following are badly formed:
This only occurs when the adjective is being modified by a deictic degree adverb. Why? I don't know. I've been looking into this for quite a long time but haven't been able to find out.
The Original Poster's Examples:
Sentences (1) and (2) are grammatical. Sentence (3) is also grammatical, but this is because the adjective big is not being modified by any adverb. The word that here is a Determiner. Sentence (4) is completely ungrammatical. Because day is singular we must use a Determiner here. If we used an indefinite article then because warm is being modified by a deictic degree adverb, the adverb adjective combination should precede the article - as in sentence (2).
Note: Thanks to Edwin and fdb for helpful observations, which have been edited into the answer.