I came across a sentence from wikipedia.
The new members advocated to resume what they regarded as the unfinished armed revolution against foreign and feudal domination, referring to the legacy and de facto continuation of the Philippine–American War of 1899, combat subjectivism and opportunism in the history of the old merger party and fight modern revisionism then being promoted by the Soviet Union.
I came to know that certain verbs must be followed by a gerund (the "ing" form of a verb). So in this case, can I rephrase this to
The new members advocated resuming what they regarded …
Is this correct?
- If yes, what are the certain verbs that must be followed by a gerund?
- If not, what is the reason behind this?
Best Answer
Firstly, I should say that I am a learner as you, but I want to share my thoughts. I wish you and others help me to improve my answer by your comments.
I start with the definition of advocate:
Based on my google searches, you can use advocate mainly in five ways.
advocate + that
advocate + to + infinitive
Thus, if you ask whether or not it is grammatical I say yes, but if you ask which pattern is more natural among the others, I am not sure.
In terms of your second question, gerunds can act as nouns and they can be used after verbs, but the question is where.
They can follow certain verbs having certain prepositions (object to, insist on, ...):
They can be used after objects with perception verbs (watch, see, hear, feel, ...):
They can be used after verbs having liking or hating connotation ( detest, love, ... )
They can be placed immediately after the verb, acting as an object (similar verbs, enjoy, finish, consider, imagine, ...)
However, as @TRomano mentioned, a transitive verb needs an object and a gerund can be used as the object since they act as nouns. There is no specific list, but I agree that we can use several common patterns and verbs to convey our intents to the native naturally.