Enclosed you will find your individual agreement of employment detailing the terms and conditions of your contract.
Rated 5 stars by Time magazine, the hotel overlooks the beautiful Langland Bay.
Why something lifeless can "detail" or "overlook" anything? Is this some kind of "personifying description" ?
Does that mean I could use any present particle(or verbs) which seems appropriate in the "meaning" to describe (or be the actions of) any lifeless things?
For example:
"This pen writes perfectly." or
"Writing perfectly, this pen is suited for everyone."
If this is not allowed, then is there any particular rules for choosing the combination?
Or can only be studied case by case.
Best Answer
Hmm, I don't see the problem. Of course inanimate objects can do things! For example, "The rock falls to the ground." The rock is doing something: it is falling. It doesn't require intelligence or will to obey the laws of gravity. Or, "The alarm clock made a loud noise." The alarm clock is doing something: making noise. It has mechanical or electronic parts that cause it to do this. Again, it doesn't have to be a living being to make noise.
To take your examples:
"The agreement details the terms and conditions." The agreement presumably contains text, and this text describes or explains the terms and conditions. That's what text does, isn't it? Of course it required a human being to formulate the words, but so what?
"The hotel overlooks Langland Bay." Maybe there's a hint of personification here. Can a building literally "look" at something? I guess that depends on the exact definition of "overlooks". If you define it in terms of height and direction, then yes. If you define it in terms of eyes and seeing, then I guess not, as a building doesn't have eyes.
Of course we do often personify inanimate objects. We might say, "This car doesn't like cold weather" when what we really mean is that it is difficult to start the car in cold weather or that it runs poorly in cold weather. Or, "My computer is sick" when we mean that it is not working properly. Etc.
"This pen writes perfectly." In this case we are using the word "write" to describe the mechanical function of depositing ink on paper. Again, something that an inanimate object is perfectly capable of doing. We might say that a person is writing in this same sense. Like if a teacher says, "The instructions for your homework are on the board. Please write them down so you don't forget", the teacher is instructing the students to perform the mechanical action of copying the text. But if she says, "You are to write a 10-page paper on the history of Ruritania", she probably is using "write" to mean the creative act of putting ideas together, etc. I wouldn't say that a pen can "write" in that sense, of course.
Are you a non-native English speaker trying to learn the language? If so, do you not use similar wording in your native language? How do you express an idea like, "The book fell off the shelf" in your language?
Or are you a native speaker who just suddenly found this un-nerving?