I am learning articles and trying to understand some edge cases.
Help me to decipher the role (the meaning) of articles in this sentence:
The lion is king of the jungle.
The lion
– is a generic reference to all lions as a class. It can be changed toLions
:Lions are kings of the jungle
, the meaning will remain the same.- How did I understand it is the generic reference? Because it is the first occurrence of the word
lion
in the text, but it is preceded by theThe
article. It suggests the author wasn't implying a specific instance of lion (his pet, for example), but a species in the family Felidae. A lion
in this case is valid grammatically, but the meaning will change to "any member of the lion species", not the species as whole.- The article about generic nouns.
- The definite article with a whole class.
- How did I understand it is the generic reference? Because it is the first occurrence of the word
king of the jungle
king
– in my opinion this noun should have thethe
article. Because it is singular and countable, therefore some article is necessary if it is not exception. Thea
article isn't suitable here, because theking
noun is specified by theof the jungle
construction: which king? –of the jungle
, not any general king. May be the king title doesn't require an article, likebreakfast
,basketball
, etc? But this rule says no – The definite article with titles and positions.the jungle
– the same meaning as in theThe lion
case. Generic reference to all jungles as a class, because it is the first occurrence of thejungle
word in the text and has thethe
article. Also interchangeable withjungles
.
Result: Lions (species, general) are the kings (title, specific) of jungles (land cover, general).
Two questions:
-
Is my interpretation correct?
-
Why doesn't
king
have thethe
article?
Note – The Oxford Dictionary says: "The lion is the king of the jungle."
Best Answer
All the grammar points presented are fine.
But in this case, please note that "king of the jungle" is a set phrase and therefore does not need an article, as in:
She is queen for the day. [an old TV show]. Please note though: It is not a mistake to say: The lion is the king of the jungle. or: Lions are the kings of the jungle. But you lose the edginess of the set phrase. :)
This is just one of those terrible exceptions that make English a b****.