Why is "give me", and not "give to me" correct? As this is dative, and we are told that it is translated (from my language) with the preposition "to" in English.
Learn English – Why “give me”, not “give to me”
prepositions
Related Solutions
You actually have the question backward! :) ... you should be asking When does an Indirect Object require a preposition?
(For those unfamiliar with the term, an Indirect Object is a secondary object of a transitive verb: it designates the entity which receives the Direct Object or for whose benefit the action is performed on the Direct Object.)
Subject - Verb - Indirect Object - Direct Object
This construction is the standard order in all di-transitive situations—those in which the verb takes both an Indirect Object and a Direct Object.
I told the police my story. OR I told them my story. I gave my son a bicycle. OR I gave him a bicycle.
I built my niece a treehouse. OR I built her a treehouse.
Sometimes, however, the Indirect Object has to fall after the Direct Object. When that happens, the syntactic relationships are no longer clear, so the Indirect Object is ‘marked’ with a preposition. There are two circumstances when this happens:
When the Direct Object is a single pronoun it is too ‘light’ for its role to be clear, so it is moved immediately after the verb:
∗ I told the police it. → okI told it to the police.
∗ I gave my son it. → okI gave it to my son.
∗ I built my niece it. → okI built it for my niece.When the Indirect Object is ‘heavy’, more than a couple-three words long, it draws focus for too long and it makes it difficult to recognize the Direct object, so it is moved after the Direct Object:
∗ I told the police who came after I called 911 my story.→ okI told my story to the police who came after I called 911.
∗ I gave Richard, my ten-year-old son going to school just a few blocks away, a bicycle. → okI gave a bicycle to Richard, my ten-year-old son going to school just a few blocks away.
∗ I built my niece, my sister's daughter Lily, a treehouse. → okI built a treehouse for my niece, my sister's daughter Lily.These ‘heavy’ Indirect Objects may not seem all that hard to process; but that is because you are encountering them in writing, where you have the advantages punctuation to clarify structure and of seeing the entire sentence at once. In speech, where your hearer must process your sentence as it emerges, it isn’t so easy, and these constructions are driven by speech patterns.
Two general “rules” are operating here.
The first is that we like to keep the core constituents of a sentence—the Subject, Verb, Indirect Object and Direct Object—as close together as possible. That drives ‘heavy’ constituents towards the right end of the sentence, where their length provides the least interruption.
The second is that we like to put the ‘new’ information in a sentence at the right end. That drives pronouns towards the left, because pronouns are almost always ‘old’ information—they usually refer to entities which have already been introduced.
A good question, Nima! First, see one of the senses for from
—used as a function word to indicate physical separation or an act or condition of removal, abstention, exclusion, release, subtraction, or differentiation (protection from the sun, relief from anxiety)
Hence, in the sentence
I want to defend society and all of its members from all ideologies, science included.
the meaning of from equals to against, in my view.
However, if in place of ideologies, science included we use phrases like all ideological strata or all ideological groups or all congregations etc., the meaning of from would change, as I see it. Compare:
I want to defend society and all of its members from all ideological strata, including those who pursue science as their chief interest.
In this case, the reader will assume that what's meant here is that the members come or originate from diverse ideological strata, or demographic groups, or ideological groups, or whatever.
Try googling protect people from all, and you will get sentences like
Our organization helps protect people from all walks of life / all backgrounds ..
Here, the people are clearly not being protected from walks of life but rather belong to these walks of life.
Best Answer
Here is the scoop on this in contemporary English. There are two possibilities, basically:
1) Give something to someone and :
Give the book to John.
Becomes:
Give it to him.
2) Give someone something
Give John the book.
Becomes:
Give him the book.
So, basically these patterns show that: give is followed by a direct object and then to and the indirect object. Or give is followed by the indirect object, then the direct object.
It is useful to memorize and practice these forms/patterns.