Learn English – “You’ve ever not got” vs “you’ve never got”
sentence-meaning
Are both sentences equal in meaning?
"You've ever not got it"
vs
"You've never got it"
Best Answer
For not to negate ever, the word not has to come right before ever. Never is pretty much an abbreviation of not ever.
You've never got it.
You've not ever got it.
This:
You've ever not got it.
does not work very well. Here is why:
Google provides 2 definitions for ever:
at any time.
"nothing ever seemed to ruffle her" synonyms: at any
time, at any point, on any occasion, under any circumstances, on any
account;
at all times; always.
"ever the man of action, he was impatient with intellectuals"
The first definition of ever is common, and in that case ever will come right before the verb it modifies. It could also come right before the verbal ruffle - e.g. "Nothing seemed to ever ruffle her". The other common option with ever in this meaning is to put it at the end of the sentence - e.g. "Nothing seemed to ruffle her ever." It will sound very strange if you stick not in the middle or put ever elsewhere in the sentence, for this meaning.
So your sentence "you've ever not got it" sounds like you are trying to use the 2nd definition of ever above. What Google is not telling you is that this use of ever is rather fancy, literary, or dramatic-ish. It's not used in typical conversation or writing unless you are trying to create those moods.
Never is short for not ever. Ever could be used in both positive and negative sentences as in "Don't you ever tell me a lie again".
It means I am sure (confident) that it won't happen. However, I would say "It could never happen" rather than "It couldn't ever happen" as using never is more idiomatic than using not ever separately. The reason not and ever are separated in "Don't you ever tell me a lie again" is ever is used for emphasis as No. 4 definition indicates in the link.
If you contrast "I have never been to the U.S." with "I have not ever been to the U.S.", it would be easier to understand the difference. The latter is rarely (almost never) used.
Could in the sentence doesn't have any past (tense) aspect. It is used as a modal verb to indicate possibility.
refers to the task or action as one that will have taken a not inconsiderable amount of time to complete
have done
refers to the completion of the action or task without reference to the amount time it will have taken, either because the task by its nature takes very little time, or because the speaker is not interested in the amount of time it will take.
Paint this picket fence, and let me know when you're done doing it,
and I'll give you another chore to keep you out of trouble.
Turn off the lights, and when you've done that, go to bed.
Best Answer
For not to negate ever, the word not has to come right before ever. Never is pretty much an abbreviation of not ever.
This:
does not work very well. Here is why:
Google provides 2 definitions for ever:
The first definition of ever is common, and in that case ever will come right before the verb it modifies. It could also come right before the verbal ruffle - e.g. "Nothing seemed to ever ruffle her". The other common option with ever in this meaning is to put it at the end of the sentence - e.g. "Nothing seemed to ruffle her ever." It will sound very strange if you stick not in the middle or put ever elsewhere in the sentence, for this meaning.
So your sentence "you've ever not got it" sounds like you are trying to use the 2nd definition of ever above. What Google is not telling you is that this use of ever is rather fancy, literary, or dramatic-ish. It's not used in typical conversation or writing unless you are trying to create those moods.