Learn English – Am I using “namesake” correctly

I found a couple of entries in the New York Times "After Deadline" column useful.

The first:

In precise, traditional usage, an “eponym” is someone or something that gives its name to something else. So “eponymous” describes the giver of the name, NOT the receiver. A restaurateur named Joe Smith could be described as the eponymous owner of Joe Smith’s Restaurant, but the establishment is not “Mr. Smith’s eponymous restaurant.”

(The opposite problem often occurs with “namesake.” That word properly describes the receiver of the name — a grandchild may be the namesake of her grandmother, but not the other way around.)

So the only ones of your examples that have the correct use of “eponymous” are those that describe the giver (the bridge) and not the receiver. And conversely, only in #6 is “namesake” used correctly.

The second entry is more pertinent to the use of “eponymous:”

Sometimes I quibble over words we overuse. Sometimes I complain about words that are misused. And sometimes I take issue with words that seem pretentious or contrived.

Then there’s “eponymous,” which could fit any of those categories.

In precise use, an eponym is someone who gives a name to something else, and “eponymous” describes the source of the name, not the receiver.

More often than not, we and others muddle this distinction. And often, there’s a way to say what we mean without using “eponymous” at all. So let’s use it sparingly, and wisely.

Hear, hear.

Edit: For reference, the entry for eponym from Wordsmith.org, one of my favorite resources:

eponym (EP-uh-nim) noun

1. A person, real or imaginary, from whom something, as a tribe, nation, or place, takes or is said to take its name.

2. A word based on or derived from a person's name.

3. Any ancient official whose name was used to designate his year of office.

No, it should not be used this way. As you pointed out, manifest is a verb meaning display or show. Synonyms are: display, show, exhibit, demonstrate, betray, present, reveal.

Substituting two synonyms, does your sentence make sense to you?

We would quickly learn that obstacles can reveal in any neighborhood.
We would quickly learn that obstacles can display in any neighborhood.

They do not make sense to me. The verb manifest is a transitive verb that needs a direct object. Something usually manifests something else.

Subsequent arguments and destructive forces typically manifest themselves downstream.

Perhaps you want the word manifested. Like revealed and shown, obstacles can be manifested.

We would quickly learn that obstacles can be revealed/be manifested in any neighborhood.

Even though this is a grammatically correct, I would not state something in this manner.