Is the following sentence grammatically correct?
I don't like autumn to be honest, neither like I winter that's coming after it.
Can inversion be used in this way? Or does it requires auxiliary do?
I don't like autumn to be honest, neither do I like winter that's coming after it.
The meaning should be: I don't like autumn, I don't like winter.
Is inversion appropriate in this case? Or is it better to use the regular word order?
- I don't like autumn to be honest, and neither I like winter that's coming after it.
- I don't like autumn to be honest, and I like winter that's coming after it either.
Which of the two is preferable?
Best Answer
Your sentence doesn't say what you want it to say, so before answering the question, I'll have to rewrite it in idiomatic English:
One problem is that prepositional phrase "to be honest", which describes your feeling in my rewrite (I've added a comma to make the phrase parenthetical and to prevent the reader from believing that it's supposed to modify "autumn") but modifies "autumn" in your sentence and means "I don't like it when autumn is honest", a meaningless (unless metaphorical and poetic) statement. The other problem is that "neither" should probably be "nor", but both are possible with different punctuation.
To invert the subject and verb without adding "do" is not natural English:
Idiomatic English would be:
or
It isn't just a matter of grammar. Style demands parallel structure here. Perhaps in German it's possible to invert the subject and verb, but English grammar has changed significantly since it might have been possible to do that more than 1000 years ago.
Google translate gave me this for English => German: