I came across this sentence in an exercise:
'Arkwright is considered the father of the modern industrial factory system and his inventions were a catalyst ___ the Industrial Revolution.'
There are 3 choices: to, for and on. I suppose, the last one won't do. Then, how do we choose? What does it depend on? I mean, what is the difference between 'catalyst for' and '…to'?
Thank you.
UPD It would be really cool if someone could explain me general difference between 'catalyst for' and 'catalyst to', i.e. not only in the aforementioned case.
Best Answer
I ran Google Books searches for "a catalyst" plus each of six prepositions: for, in, of, on, to, and with over the period 1900–2005. The resulting Ngram chart shows that, until about 1970, authors had very mixed preferences about which preposition to use:
Over the years 1970–2005, however, "a catalyst for" (blue line) has emerged as the predominant wording, with "a catalyst to" (red line) a modest second, "a catalyst in" (yellow line) a solid third, "a catalyst of" (green line) a steady fourth, and "a catalyst on" (teal line) a relative rarity.
A typical example of "a catalyst for" appears in André-Noël Chaker, Good Governance in Sport: A European Survey (2005):
In contrast, the vast majority of Google Books instances of "a catalyst to" use the phrase to introduce a verb (as in "a catalyst to promote the combustion process") rather than a noun (as in "a catalyst to the Industrial Revolution"). Still, such instances do occur, as in John Schofield & A.G. Vince, Medieval Towns: The Archaeology of British Towns in Their European Setting (2003):
Though I didn't do an exhaustive study of the search results, "a catalyst of" seems somewhat more common than "a catalyst to" in the setting that the OP asks about. From Boon Kheng Cheah, Malaysia: The Making of a Nation (2002):
Even "a catalyst in" is sometimes used in the relevant sense. From Natalie La Balme, "Constraint, Catalyst, or Political Tool," in Decisionmaking in a Glass House (2000):
Even "a catalyst on" is not unknown in such situations, although instances are few. From Gerritt Voogt, Constraint on Trial: Dirck Volckertsz Coornhert and Religious Freedom (2000):
All of these formulations involve descriptions of things that act as catalysts with regard to a process or development, which is essentially the sense that the OP asks about. In such contexts, using any of the five prepositions discussed here might be defensible. But in writing, at any rate, "a catalyst for" has become by far the most common choice in recent decades.