Consider:
This book provides a solid psychological understanding of these experiments, and adds a few expansions and conclusions of its own. It also provides …
My question regards the comma. I have been told that having the comma there is an error.
According to Wikipedia this seems to be the case according to “some style guides”. The reason is that the stuff after the comma is not independent; it’s dependent on what comes before.
What do you think? It would seem to me the comma helps a lot, because those two “and”s without any comma make the sentence rather cluttered. That’s why I put the comma there. So I’m not sure.
Best Answer
The Wikipedia like you gave is actually unrelated to the matter at hand. It is talking about separating clauses. When you have two independent clauses connected by a coördinating conjunction, it is considered “mandatory” to use a comma before that conjunction.
The only exception generally admissible to this rule is when the two clause are especially short:
However, in your own example, the subject does not change. That means you have a compound predicate. You do not have two separate clauses.
Notice that that and is coördinating two verbs governed by the same subject, and as such, does not have to have a comma. However, you will note that in the previous sentence, the same situation of one subject and two verbs applied, but this time I did use a comma nevertheless.
That’s because compound predicates can sometimes take, and indeed really must have for correct understanding, a comma separating them even though no new clause is begun. A comma there is not forbidden, but it takes a good ear for the language to know when to do this, and when not to. Placing a comma before an and that is not separating clauses is tricky, and somewhat open to taste and judgement, and disagreement.
Here is a fine set of examples of commas before a coördinating conjunction from one particular Professor of English, someone who certainly had an ear for the English language.
Tolkien was extremely careful with his punctuation, and knew what he was about. Yes, some of those commas you might get away without, but surely no one can call them “wrong”. In the same way, whoever or whatever is calling your original example “wrong” is mistaken. Your comma there is just fine, and will do.