I'd like to understand/ask how much these two words overlaps each other.
These definitions were excerpted from Oxford Dictionaries.
Do you think we can replace the word with emit in these sentences?
What I ask is that, for example, if we can say
" Wonderful smells were emitting from the kitchen."
or
"He emitting tranquility"
1.(Of a feeling, quality, or sensation) issue or spread out from (a source):
Warmth emanated from the fireplace
She felt an undeniable charm emanating from him
1.1Originate from; be produced by:
The proposals emanated from a committee
Angry voices emanated from the room. (Cambridge)
Wonderful smells were emanating from the kitchen. ( Logman)
1.2 [with object] Give out or emit (a feeling, quality, or sensation):
He emanated a powerful brooding air
He emanates tranquility. (Longman)
And secondly, I cannot understand noun form of the word 'to emanate'
-
Does "the risk of radon gas emanation" have the same meaning with " the risk of radon gas emission"
-
What does "The unique symbol for the comprehensive oneness that holds together this entire process of emanation or divinization is the concept of Sophia" mean in this sense?
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/emanation
Best Answer
I think the key distinction between emit and emanate is described pretty well in the definitions you provided: nature of the source or how it is handled. Emit implies a focused dispersion while emanate is more of a general one. For example, a sound as viewed from its source "emanates in all directions," but a microphone some distance away would "pick up the emitted sound." Thus, emit would not be a suitable replacement in the first two sentence examples because the implied nature of the smell and state of being is an omni-directional one.
As for emanation vs emission, the former carries all the connotations of the latter with the addition of a descriptor of the emission's nature: that it was omni-directional. A laser could be described as a particle emission but not a particle emanation.
The theological quote seems to use it to be describing a state of divinity so great so as to ooze from the entity/idea in question (not sure on context), but on that I'm less clear.