Should I write "cost-benefit" (hyphen) or "cost–benefit" (en dash), and why?
Learn English – Does “cost-benefit ratio” use a hyphen or an en-dash
dasheshyphenation
Related Solutions
An em-dash is typically used as a stand-in for a comma or parenthesis to separate out phrases—or even just a word—in a sentence for various reasons (e.g. a parenthetical; an ersatz-ellipsis). Examples where an em-dash should be used:
- School is based on the three R’s—reading, writing, and ’rithmetic.
- Against all odds, Pete—the unluckiest man alive—won the lottery.
- I sense something; a presence I've not felt since—
An en-dash is used to connect values in a range or that are related. A good rule is to use it when you're expressing a "to" relationship. Examples where an en-dash should be used:
- in years 1939–1945
- pages 31–32 may be relevant
- New York beat Los Angeles 98–95
- When American English would use an em-dash – following British and Canadian conventions.
A hyphen is used to join words in a compound construction, or separate syllables of a word, like during a line break, or (self-evidently) a hyphenated name.
- pro-American
- cruelty-free eggs
- em-dash
- it's pronounced hos-pi-tal-it-tee
- Olivia Newton-John
The minus sign is distinct from all three of the above.
- 4 − 2 = 2.
If you want to use the correct dash or hyphen in Stack Exchange comments, just use the appropriate HTML entity: —
for em-dash, –
for en-dash, and −
for the minus sign. The hyphen is, of course, directly on your keyboard.
Figure dash
The figure dash (‒) is so named because it is the same width as a digit, at least in fonts with digits of equal width. This is true of most fonts, not only monospaced fonts.
The figure dash is used within numbers (e.g. phone number 555‒0199), especially in columns for maintaining alignment. Its meaning is the same as a hyphen, as represented by the hyphen-minus glyph; by contrast, the en dash is more appropriately used to indicate a range of values; the minus sign also has a separate glyph.
The figure dash is often unavailable; in this case, one may use a hyphen-minus instead. In Unicode, the figure dash is U+2012 (decimal 8210). HTML authors must use the numeric forms ‒
or ‒
to type it unless the file is in Unicode; there is no equivalent character entity.
Hyphen and dash are at least three distinct characters, and the hyphen is the shortest.
- Hyphens “-” are primarily used in compound words (a 20-year-old co-ed) and when a word is broken at the end of a line (which explains why word breaking is called hyphenation). Hyphens are always very short, narrower than most letters. There is never a space between the hyphen and a word fragment that it joins (though there may be a space on one side in constructs like “pre- and post-conference activities”).
- En-dashes “–” are mostly used to express a range (1932–1945). They are sometimes used as super-hyphens (a Los Angeles–New York flight). In these uses, there is no space before or after. They are so named because they are as wide as a lowercase “n” in most fonts.
- Em-dashes “—” are sentence punctuation — often parenthetical — as shown in this sentence. They are at least as wide as an ”m”, occasionally even wider. There is no consensus as to whether to surround them by spaces.
- Another similar character is the minus sign. It is typically about one en wide and thicker than a hyphen or dash, but this is dictated by the choice of mathematical font which can be chosen separately from the main text font.
- There are many more somewhat similar characters and other uses of these characters; Wikipedia has a list as well as a lot of minutiae on these characters and their uses.
Best Answer
Formally, hyphens are for joining terms, and en dashes are for ranges and distinctions. En dashes have a secondary application joining terms that are already hyphenated or contain spaces, but that doesn't apply here. In this situation I would use an en dash or a slash. Of course, if you do write it with a hyphen, nobody is going to be confused.
Technically, cost–benefit analysis can be interpreted as either [cost–benefit] analysis—an analysis of costs versus benefits—or cost–[benefit analysis]—costs versus an analysis of benefits. Luckily, the latter doesn't make any sense and would really only arise from deliberate pedantic misinterpretation.