I have always had the view that the term "Asian", when pertaining to cultures, primarily refers to the cultures of the Far East. Recently I have been told that it also includes Indian and other cultures located on/around the Indian subcontinent.
For reference, I am a native speaker of American English. Would anyone be able to shed some light on whether there is a generally accepted usage in the various English-speaking countries?
For example, it seems unnatural to me to refer to a person from India as "Asian", even though I am aware India is geographically located within the continent of Asia.
Best Answer
Like all questions dealing with complex issues, the answer is very simple; it depends.
Geographically, any resident of the Asian continent, which is historically bordered by the Ural Mountains and Red Sea on its west side and by oceans to the north, east and south, is an "Asian"; they are a person of Asia.
However, in more common parlance the term tends to exclude Russia, what we currently call the "Middle East" including Pakistan, and the countries in the "Indian sub-continent" including India proper and other nations to the southwest of or in the Himalayan range such as Nepal, Bhutan, etc. This leaves primarily Mongolia, China, Southeast Asia, Japan, the Indonesian archipelago and most other Western Pacific Islands besides the Australasian islands.
This was not always so, especially in terms of India; during British colonial days, the Indian people and those in neighboring territories were termed "Asians". The two terms were at one point roughly synonymous, as the entire region from the Horn of Africa to Southeast Asia was once known as the "East Indies".