Learn English – Double Copula or “double is” in professional/technical writing

business-languagecopular-verbsgrammar

I am proofreading a professional, technical text written by someone else. In the text, I encountered, "But, the reality is is a…" My intuition says that this should be rewritten as, "But, the reality is that a…" because it looks like a "double is" or a "double copula"

However, I can't tell for sure if this is a legitimate use of two successive copulae. Does, "But, the reality is…" qualify as a dependent clause? It seems to me that "But,…" does not make the subject dependent. Am I right? Am I wrong?

The sentence with a little more context:
"But, the reality is is a company like Spacely Sprockets cannot continue to do old fashioned things…"

(We have already had a discussion about beginning sentences with "but" in professional writing. It appears that the consensus is that it is both appropriate and acceptable here.)

I would like to see a way to clearly identify this statement as something that ought to be changed in the document. Grammar dissection, linking to authoritative works and explanations of grammar mechanics will all help me answer this question. Simple answers like, "it's wrong," don't help me be a better proofreader or editor. I already know it is wrong, but I don't know why it is wrong.

Best Answer

Doubtless some will say NGrams isn't appropriate here, but I think this is interesting...

enter image description here

Obviously many of those instances are "false positives" (particularly, the earlier ones). But the increase in prevalence is quite marked, and glancing through a few pages of the later instances shows that many of them are indeed the construction OP asks about.

Structurally, what seems to be happening is that two separate elements (for example, "the thing is" and "is that") have both become grammaticalised in the mind of the speaker, so they're seen as independent self-contained grammatical items - each containing its own copy of the word "is".

As the chart suggests, it's very much an emerging usage that's gradually extending its scope, so...

"What it is is that blah blah" - seems unremarkable to me.

"The point is is that blah blah" - sounds somewhat "off", but I can live with it.

"The problem with this is is that it sounds weird" - to me, at least, it really does.

Different speakers will draw their own line as to where the construction becomes "unacceptable". Some people may think it makes a difference whether there's a comma between the two instances of "is". But because this is (still?) primarily a spoken usage, and people don't punctuate speech, I think that's largely irrelevant.

Addressing OP's specific question, I'd advise against using the form in "professional" writing for the two reasons mentioned above - it's mainly a spoken rather than written usage, and not everyone will be happy with it in any given context.

Related Topic