The question is a little more complex than the title states. Exceptioned
is not in the dictionary. But I am not trying to use this as a verb.
I work in IT. We keep a list of exceptioned
words that we parse through on an inbound email. As far as I'm aware, everyone in my industry uses this term quite frequently. I'm also wondering, can others understand what I'm trying to say? What happens that allows someone to "define" this word in the context I'm using it, even if it is incorrect?
I'm not literately inclined. So, I don't even know what part of speech exceptioned
should be. But the overall question is, even if this is NOT a real word, why does it "feel" right? Is this really wrong?
I suddenly got hit by the linguistics bug, and something like this example, started to fascinate me. I have so many more questions now!
[Excuse my incorrect tags usage]
Best Answer
The unacknowledged life of 'exceptioned' and 'unexceptioned'
Both exceptioned and unexceptioned appear often enough in Google Books search results to yield Ngram graphs. Here is the Ngram chart for the period 1800–2008 for exceptioned (blue line) and unexceptioned (red line):
As the chart indicates, unexceptioned is the earlier word. A Google Books search finds matches for it dating back to Daniel Defoe, "The Parallel: or Persecution of Protestants the shortest way to prevent the Growth of Popery in Ireland" in A Second Volume of the Writings of the Author of The True-born Englishman (1705):
Unexceptioned seems to be have been used almost exclusively as an adjective during its three centuries of existence. The meaning appears to be "without exception, or not admitting of exceptions." I was surprised to find that the Compact Edition OED of 1971 has no entry for unexceptioned, considering that the word goes back so far in English literature, and that a Google Books search finds about 150 unique matches for the term overall, including several from 2014.
'Exceptioned' as an adjective
The earliest match for exceptioned in Google Books search results involves its use as an adjective, too. From a letter of James Bowdoin to Thomas Pownall (December 3, 1770), reprinted in The Bowdoin and Temple Papers, volume 1 (1897):
Here exceptioned appears to mean "taken exception to, or criticized." But more-recent instances of exceptioned as an adjective seem to carry the meaning "excepted, or exceptional," as in Frederick Bruner, The Churchbook: Matthew 13–28 (2004):
The same general sense of exceptioned as an adjective appears in tech publications such as G. Neufeld & M. Ito, Protocols for High Speed Networks IV (2013):
'Exceptioned' as a verb
Exceptioned first appears in Google Books search results as a verb in Francis Spilsbury, Free Thoughts on Quacks and their Medicines, Occasioned by the Death of Dr. Goldsmith and Mr. Scawen (1776):
Here again, exceptioned seems to mean "taken exception to"—but this time as a past-tense verb, rather than as an adjective. But more recent usage shows the term being used to mean "treated as an exception [to some rule]." For example, from Steve Hughes, Jim Samuelson & S. Miller, SQL Server DTS (2002):
Conclusions
I suspect that exceptioned feels right to the poster because in the field of IT in which he works the term is part of the nomenclature—whether technical, colloquial, jargony, or otherwise. Under the circumstances, the question "Is it a word?" seems fairly easy to answer affirmatively—especially since it has been around for more than 240 years in other senses.
The crucial question is whether the people that the poster is trying to communicate with will recognize the intended sense—and the rightness—of the word (as he does) or will be baffled by it. If the poster feels reasonable confident that the intended audience will understand the word, I see no reason to avoid using it, either as an adjective or as a verb.