The basic rules of forming comparatives:
One-syllable words take "er":
- clear -> clearer
- sweet -> sweeter
Multisyllable words take "more":
- incredible -> more incredible (not "incredibler")
- horrible -> more horrible (not "horribler")
Two-syllable words ending in consonant + "y" take "ier":
- happy -> happier
- pretty -> prettier
Both "more clear" and "clearer" are acceptable:
Your answer is more clear than mine.
Your answer is clearer than mine.
Frequency of use: clearer than is twice as common as more clear than, although both are common.
According to Swan in Pratical English Usage (p114) the two-syllable adjectives whose comparative form is most likely to be formed with -er are those that end with an unstressed vowel; e.g. narrow, simple, clever, subtle, etc. from your list above. Swan goes on to state:
With many two-syllable adjectives (e.g. polite, common) -er/-est and
more/most are both possible. With others (including adjectives ending
in -ing, -ed, -ful, and -less), only more/most is possible. In
general, the structure with more/most is becoming more common. To find
out the normal comparative and superlative for a particular
two-syllable adjective, check in a good dictionary.
It is interesting that Swan himself uses more common and not commoner in his explanation above, and this seems the better choice in a formal written context. So if you are looking for guidelines for your advanced students I would recommend:
- Learn the common two-syllable adjectives ending with an unstressed
vowel that can be compared with -er.
- For the rest use more. I suspect that native speakers are much more
likely (likelier?) to consider an -er usage problematic than a
more usage. For example, more polite or even more clever will probably sound less ungrammatical than pleasanter or
tranquil(l)er.
If your students really would like to know word-by-word if the -er comparative is possible, they will need to consult a good dictionary. Swan recommends the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, the MacMillan English Dictionary and the Collins Cobuild English Dictionary.
The Collins, for example, shows pleasanter but more tranquil as the comparative forms.
Best Answer
Generally accepted view is that there is a nuance between “(a) the leg of the table and (b) “the table’s leg”. In the same way as there is a nuance between (a) “the more gentle detergent” and (b) “the gentler detergent”.
Although this origin is disputed by some linguists[1], In both cases, the (a)s represent the Anglo-Norman (analytic) influence and the (b)s the Anglo-Saxon (synthetic) influence. Anglo-Norman origins tends to indicate a softer approach and the Anglo-Saxon tends to indicate a more factual/direct approach.
Monosyllabic adjectives usually take the –er form. Adjectives with three and more syllables take the “more” form. Disyllabic adjectives may take either[2] but with a tendency/trend towards the analytic “more” [3] but not in all cases.
Google Ngrams for more gentle,gentler,more common,commoner https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=more+gentle%2Cgentler%2Cmore+common%2Ccommoner&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cmore%20gentle%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cgentler%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmore%20common%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccommoner%3B%2Cc0
Despite this both are correct and “being more popular” is not the same as “being better”.
[1] “More Support for More-Support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms” By Britta Mondorf
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6VA6AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=English+%22the+more+comparative%22&source=bl&ots=fJcBP8iaIi&sig=ACfU3U0CXbDPsFXFbYtt1ZawFxcEjwoXzA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwixirKAoJroAhUTnVwKHbX8AuEQ6AEwB3oECEsQAQ#v=onepage&q=English%20%22the%20more%20comparative%22&f=false
[2]
[3]