Learn English – Is it incorrect to use “more gentle”

comparatives

Most dictionaries list "gentler" as the comparative form of "gentle", but "more gentle" also sounds correct. According to this forum post, it is.


EDIT March 14, 2020

Another question investigates the general rules for forming disyllabic comparatives: Conundrum: "cleverer" or "more clever", "simpler" or "more simple" etc. The conclusion is that, outside of words with some specific endings, a dictionary must be consulted for each case. In contrast to that question, this question addresses a specific word and the degree to which modern dictionaries are correct in defining its comparative.

Best Answer

Generally accepted view is that there is a nuance between “(a) the leg of the table and (b) “the table’s leg”. In the same way as there is a nuance between (a) “the more gentle detergent” and (b) “the gentler detergent”.

Although this origin is disputed by some linguists[1], In both cases, the (a)s represent the Anglo-Norman (analytic) influence and the (b)s the Anglo-Saxon (synthetic) influence. Anglo-Norman origins tends to indicate a softer approach and the Anglo-Saxon tends to indicate a more factual/direct approach.

Monosyllabic adjectives usually take the –er form. Adjectives with three and more syllables take the “more” form. Disyllabic adjectives may take either[2] but with a tendency/trend towards the analytic “more” [3] but not in all cases.

Google Ngrams for more gentle,gentler,more common,commoner https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=more+gentle%2Cgentler%2Cmore+common%2Ccommoner&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cmore%20gentle%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cgentler%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmore%20common%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccommoner%3B%2Cc0

Despite this both are correct and “being more popular” is not the same as “being better”.

[1] “More Support for More-Support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms” By Britta Mondorf

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6VA6AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=English+%22the+more+comparative%22&source=bl&ots=fJcBP8iaIi&sig=ACfU3U0CXbDPsFXFbYtt1ZawFxcEjwoXzA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwixirKAoJroAhUTnVwKHbX8AuEQ6AEwB3oECEsQAQ#v=onepage&q=English%20%22the%20more%20comparative%22&f=false

[2]

ibid. König (1994:540) states that the choice between the synthetic vs. analytic comparative (...) depends primarily on the syllable structure of the adjective. Monosyllabic adjectives take the inflectional form: big, bigger, biggest; adjectives with three syllables take the analytic form: intelligent, more intelligent, most intelligent. Disyllabic adjectives accept both strategies.

[3]

ibid Chapter 5 investigates the impact of morphological determinants and shows how growing morphological complexity is paralleled by an increased use of the analytic more-variant.

Related Topic