In order to get a broader history of 'from scratch', I checked the PhraseDoctor. He writes for "start from scratch":
'Scratch' has been used since the 18th century as a sporting term for a boundary or starting point which was scratched on the ground. The first such scratch was the crease which is a boundary line for batsmen in cricket.
John Nyren's Young Cricketer's Tutor, 1833 records this line from a 1778 work by Cotton:
"Ye strikers... Stand firm to your scratch, let your bat be upright."
It is the world of boxing that has given us the concept of 'starting from scratch'. The scratched line there specified the positions of boxers who faced each other at the beginning of a bout. This is also the source of 'up to scratch', i.e. meet the required standard, as pugilists would have had to do when offering themselves for a match.
Scratch later came to be used as the name of any starting point for a race. The term came to be used in 'handicap' races where weaker entrants were given a head start. For example, in cycling those who were given no advantage had the handicap of 'starting from scratch', while others started ahead of the line. Other sports, notably golf, have taken up the figurative use of scratch as the term for 'with no advantage - starting from nothing'.
For the term made from scratch, this blog writes:
This use of scratch derives from a line or mark drawn or scratched into the ground to indicate a boundary or starting-point in sports, especially cricket and boxing. That meaning of scratch goes back to the late 18th century. From there it came to apply specifically to the starting point, in a handicap, of a competitor who received no odds: "Mr. Tom Sabin, of the Coventry Bicycle Club, has won, during last week, three races from scratch." (Bicycle Journal, August 18, 1878).
It was later applied figuratively with the meaning "from nothing", and it was used thus by James Joyce in Ulysses (1922): "A poor foreign immigrant who started scratch as a stowaway and is now trying to turn an honest penny." Thereafter it was taking up in cooking once boxed mixes and prepared foods became widely available. Today it is a badge of honor to be able to say one made a culinary delight from scratch.
As the other two answers mention, "scratch" refers to sporting events. However, it was first used in terms of boxing and cricket after which the term was applied to races.
With a focusing modifier like "only", the only practical rule in writing is to place it sensibly so as not to cause confusion. "Only" usually precedes its focus, and it can often be placed adjacent to it, as in "We found only one error", in which case "only" is modifying the NP "one error". But if the focus is contained within a verb phrase, as it is in that example, then non-adjacent is usually fine, as in "We only found one error", in which case "only" is now modifying the whole verb phrase.
In your example, placing "only" adjacent and before "United States" is clearly not an option, so it's fine to place it before the preposition "in", in which case it's modifying the whole preposition phrase. Also, there is the option here to place it immediately after the focus, as in "It happened in the United States only", though this might be the least preferred option.
In the case of "alone", things are a tad different since it can only be placed after its focus (which incidentally can only be a noun phrase), so "It happened in the United States alone" is the only option.
Best Answer
I've heard both used. I think it just depends on whether you consider the aisle to be a place in need of cleanup ('in aisle two') or a surface in need of cleanup ('on aisle two').
This NGram shows that 'in aisle' is actually used more frequently than 'on aisle' in general, though that isn't limited to just the 'cleanup' usage.