What does this phrase mean? Is it funny? ? Don’t you have to be at the
party in order to be the life of it? Why would someone be afraid to be
the life of a party? Is she shy? Are parties living beings? Of course,
being the life of the party means that you are the center of
attention. So, if you are the center of attention when not present,
that means that people are talking about you. From our lived
experiences, we know that gossiping – people talking about you when
you are not there – is generally a bad thing. Just like Sherlock
Holmes, we can deduce meaning (and humor) by making these connections.
...
Resource (and the whole article): The genius of Watson
I think that there is possibly confusion here between may, can and would.
It is possible that she once used to say expressions like:
Can I have ...
Can I get ...
and was taught that it was more polite to use may rather than can in that context.
Although strictly, can relates to the ability to do something, whereas may concerns permission to do something, can is often used instead of may in constructs such as the above. That works acceptably in the first person: "Can/May I [do something]".
Can and may are also used interchangeably is expressions such as:
You may leave now.
You can leave now.
Although both are intended to give permission, again - strictly - the latter relates to the ability to leave (as if the person were previously locked in!).
So can and may are often interchanged when asking or giving permission, but, in your niece's case, she was doing neither: she was requesting someone else to do something. In that case, can still works, strictly meaning "Are you able to pass the salt?" (maybe the other person couldn't reach it!), although it is really being used to mean "Would you please pass the salt?". In this case, may is wrong because she is not asking or giving permission: she is making a request.
So:
may and can are used interchangeably when asking or giving permission.
would (or will) and can (or could) are used interchangeably when making a request.
[I was going to support this by referring to dictionary definitions, but @terdon's answer (with definitions) got posted while I was still writing mine, so I've omitted doing that.]
Best Answer
feisty (adj.) etymology
1896, "aggressive, exuberant, touchy," American English, with -y (2) + feist "small dog," earlier fice, fist (American English, 1805); short for fysting curre "stinking cur," attested from 1520s
And cuteness.com:
You and your friend are both correct. One man's dog is another's 'curre'!