What do we mean by "dialect"?
First of all, let me say that the distinction between "dialect", "slang", and "language" is fuzzy, arbitrary, and fundamentally a social (cultural, political) construct.
Two dialects of the same language can be mutually unintelligible (e.g. Moroccan and Baghdadi Arabic — significantly different on every level), while two separate languages can be almost 100% understandable (e.g. Serbian and Croatian — considered different for nationalistic reasons by some). You can also have a language continuum; for example, Dutch and German are completely different languages. If you start out in northern Germany, and start heading (along the correct path) from town to town, you'll find that each neighboring town understands each other, but once you are in the middle of the Netherlands, you'll realize that people are now speaking dialects of Dutch, and at some point you crossed over from one to another, but there was never a line where one group is speaking German and the other speaks Dutch.
Defining what a "language" is in real terms
A good way to think about why we have dialects and accents is if you don't think about a language as a single entity of some kind. Each official "language" is more of an abstract concept. Instead, you can think of language as a distributed system, where no member of the system (any speaker of the language) has complete knowledge of the system. Those members who come in contact with each other influence each other as they communicate and interact, meaning that there is bi-directional feedback between members. Due to things like innovation, misunderstandings, reanalysis, and borrowing, random elements enter into the system and drive change. Also, the population is always adding new members who are more malleable and losing older members.
The more isolated and coherent a group of people are, the more these types of variation lead to deviation in the form of the language, because the repeated interaction with members having similar grammar leads to a sort of feedback loop. (You can think of this as being somewhat analogous to isolated groups of people having genetic defects or features in common, because the repeated combining of similar DNA amplifies subtle mutations.)
This is happening all at the same time, with "group of people" being defined at all levels, and all updating and influencing each other at the same time. For example, each person has his own way of speaking, and households will often develop unique features in the way they speak. Different age groups, genders, and other culturally defined groups may have their own features as well. People's grammars are being influenced by their peers and, in turn, influencing their peers.
Looking at language in this way, it makes perfect sense that we would have all sorts of variation.
So, the real reason why we have dialects is actually because we arbitrarily choose one version of a language and deem that "the language", making every deviation from this official version a de facto dialect. In reality, we are a huge system of varying idiolects with varying levels of coherence.
Differences in language change today
There are certain things that drive a language towards greater and broader coherence nowadays. The biggest is education and a writing system. With everyone learning standard English in school, and a standard writing system, we maintain some connection to a certain version of a language that changes much more slowly and conservatively.
Another major factor that maintains widespread language coherence is media: books, radio, TV, Internet. On television, we hear a variety of different accents, and above all others, a "dialect-free" version of English. We can read books, webpages, and listen to the radio, and all of these things impact our own internal version of language.
For these reasons, language change in English might take a different form than it had for its entire existence until 100-200 years ago. It may be slower to change in certain ways, and faster in others, dialects may merge, or any number of other things.
Garrison Keillor doesn't know, and online sources are all rather contradictory (the game is variously said to have originated in Germany, Ireland, Sweden, and the U.S.) and dubious. So the best answer may well be that origin of the Minnesota name is lost to history, and any answers will be speculative.
I noticed, however, that of all the variants played in different countries— le facteur ("the postman"), plumpsack (lit. "the plump sack"), 수건 돌리기 (loosely, "towel whirl")— only the Swedish name is similar to the English: Anka Anka Gås (i.e. duck duck goose). Digging around a bit more, I did find a site which referred to the Swedish game by a different name: Anka Anka Grå Anka, which happens to translate to duck duck grey duck. An alternative, Anka, Anka, Gråttanka, is attested to on Reddit.
Now, this name is vanishingly rare on the Internet compared to Anka Anka Gås (4 vs 27,000 Google.se results). Nevertheless, Minnesota has the largest concentration of ethnic Swedes in the U.S.— its most common surnames to this day are Scandinavian, and I could certainly envision a scenario where a regional or dialectic name of the game was transplanted by immigrants to became the prevalent usage in the new country even as it faded in the old. The Swedish community was fairly isolated until the turn of the 20th century but has been economically quite successful since.
Best Answer
For a specific object, use past tense because we are talking about its history, but for something representative of a class (like milk in general) use the present tense since the same answer applies to all instances. The first is about an object having arrived from somewhere else, the second is about the origins of that thing in general. So, that bottle of milk came from the supermarket, but milk in general comes from cows or similar arrangements thereto.