This is what I have gathered from the dictionary and a few other websites:
entry: the act of entering, in a more formal way
entrance: the act of entering; a gate/door, etc
admittance: permission to enter a place,institution, etc
admission: the act of accepting sb into an institution, organisation,etc;
the fee paid for entrance
But I'm still confused by a few sentences involving 'admission' and 'admittance'. According to the definitions above, are the two words inter-changeable in the following contexts?
- You cannot just go into the club as admission is restricted to members only.
- To go into a foreign country, one usually needs to have an admission visa.
- Admittance to school depends on places available.
Similarly, for the following uses of 'entry' and 'entrance', I feel most of them are inter-changeable, too:
- The burglars force an entry into the rich man's house.
- He refused me entrance to his house.
- The headmaster's sudden entrance frightened the pupils.
- The villain makes his entrance in Scene III.
- The entrance of the pop star was greeted with shouts and screams.
- One is usually not allowed entrance to a room where dangerous things are to be found.
- There are signs saying 'No Entrance' everywhere.
- The refugees were not granted entry to any country.
Can anyone tell me whether I am correct? Thanks in advance : )
Best Answer
I'm writing from what I've observed in my daily life; it may be wrong.
Entrance & admittance are used when physical or any other specific aspect of the act (of entering) is in focus.
Entry & admission are used in more conceptual or abstract sense. These are used in situations where the fact that the act has happened is more important than the how it happened.
Also,
Entry & entrance involves crossing/going in some kind of boundary or border.
Admission & admittance involves permitting/inclusion of someone/something into some kind of structure/system or a well defined region of space with specific purpose.
Now coming to the examples:
Here the house would be the border. Entry is used because physical aspect of the act is not important. We are not talking about how or from where the burglars entered the house, the focus is on the fact that they managed to enter into the house.
Consider this example,
Here the physical aspect, a literal hole in the cave wall, is in focus.
It is better to use entry in this sentence, as it is less focused on the way and more focused on act of entering (or on not entering in this example).
You can also say,
Here more emphasis on your entrance. This makes it more specific and less abstract.
Both words can be used here with slight change in focus, as no clear boundary is defined in this sentence. Using entrance makes us ask questions about the place (physical aspect of the boundary). It is an examination hall or a classroom perhaps? (entrance to where?)
Using entry arises more abstract questions about the ongoing state, like what is the previous state of pupils before they were frightened. Attentively listening to class or tensely waiting for their grades. (entry to which kind of situation?)
In these two examples the physical aspect is more important, like the background music/shouts or the abruptness of the scene change. Here the boundary is the existing scene/composition of the stage. Entrance is always used in these kind of situations.
As said in one of the earlier answers, 'admitted' should replace 'allowed entrance' in this sentence. A room containing dangerous things is not just a boundary, it is a complete system/space.
This is a better version as entry and allowed are separated; room is more represented as a boundary. But I still support using admitted.
Use entry as it represents any kind of entering. A 'No Entry' sign discourages any kind of entry or the act of entering itself; it doesn't mention about the method of entrance or any other specific aspect of the action.
Here it is more focused. The sign cares about weight or heaviness (physical).
Here, country is used a boundary, rather than a separate system. As it is mentioned in an abstract sense, entry can be used. See other variations:
We are focussing on a specific place (which exists physically).
Here we are referring to the venue where the ceremony is taking place (even though not stated explicitly).
One thing to note is the usage of admittance is decreasing recently. One reason may be because our systems are becoming more abstract with time. Physical buildings like the White House have far less significance in today's impression of a Government than a few centuries ago, when a physical objects like crown or throne were more important.
I see no problem here. You should use entry if use club-hall or club building, instead of club (they are defined by borders).
Here 'country' is generally treated as a border, so entry should be used. Admission can also be used if country is treated as a system, into which immigrants or visitors are supposed to get assimilated.
Admission is more appropriate. School is defined as an abstract entity here. It is used in the meaning 'institution of education' rather than as the building in which teaching is done.
As N. Presley said above, admittance is better used only in the meaning of "authorization to physically enter a structure".