According to different dictionaries, state and status have different meanings.
However, is there any case they could have the same meaning? For example:
-
The state of the situation is not clear
-
The status of the situation is not clear
meaning
According to different dictionaries, state and status have different meanings.
However, is there any case they could have the same meaning? For example:
The state of the situation is not clear
The status of the situation is not clear
Best Answer
They are similar - both talk about the situation, but to my ear, status is more 'meta' than state.
In both cases, the state/status is a condition of sorts, and there can be considerable semantic overlap. However, consider swapping the terms in the examples: status of the company's finances and state of the bill. Let's work this through by looking at a few quotes, using finances as the point of comparison.
State tends to refer to the finances on its own merits while status tends to relate to a classification of the finances for some external purpose.
Spending money would worsen the state of finances (its financial worth). However, if it costs money to, say, properly audit the financials so that the ratings authorities would grant a better classification (e.g. AA instead of BB), then spending money could be said to improve someone's financial status.
Here are some examples of questions and answers to illustrate the position I'm articulating:
In your examples, if the state of the situation is unclear, it is the situation itself that is uncertain; if the status of the situation is unclear, the situation might be very well understood, but its assigned rank is unclear.
Nevertheless, to your specific question about whether it is possible for the state and status of something to refer to the same thing - yes, it is. For example, a status report reports on the state of a situation.