For example "animals and cats", "plants and flowers", "stars and suns" etc.
It’s similar to tautology but the things aren’t synonym. Is there a name for this figure?
figures-of-speech
For example "animals and cats", "plants and flowers", "stars and suns" etc.
It’s similar to tautology but the things aren’t synonym. Is there a name for this figure?
Best Answer
I spent a little time researching the various figures of speech and found a few that are certainly related to the form you are describing. The specific pattern you note wasn't on Wikipedia's list (or I missed it) but the general purpose of the form is probably covered by a mix of the following terms.
Your example is using explicit repetition of similar terms in order to achieve a particular effect. This is more explicitly evoked when the list is greater than two:
And it can be used in "reverse":
It does not, however, cover the intended comparisons which is mostly evidenced by this counterexample:
The de-escalation close enough to your example that I would want to classify it as the same figure of speech and, therefore, "polysyndeton" is not a complete match.
Pleonasm applies to the redundant, tautological aspect of your example:
If you scan through the myriad of examples on Wikipedia, you can notice that redundancy is the key aspect of classifying something as a pleonasm. A few handpicked examples:
The redundant use of "cat" after using "animal" matches the strict definition of a pleonasm but since the redundancy only travels one way, I do not think the pattern is a perfect fit.
If your usage always traveled from "subcategory" to "supercategory" you are operating with a climax. The emphasis of performing this pattern is consistent with the purpose of using a climax and, therefore, your form qualifies.
Reversing the order actually shows how the climax works:
Due to how climaxes work, the most important variant is the one listed at the end. If you wanted to convey that you love all animals, (1) is the best choice. If you, on the other hand, you wanted to convey a special love of cats you should use (2).
A hendiadys matches the unnecessary repetition and also allows for a drastic scaling difference between the two words. The choice of splitting the description of "animals" into "cats and animals" fits the description of hendiadys in the sense that you are using two (or more) terms instead of one. The extra term is purely for rhetorical effect.
The only problem with classifying your form as a hendiadys is that the other examples are pointing toward splitting one term into two terms. "Cold wind" becomes "cold and wind"; "rainy weather" becomes "rain and weather". Taking "cats" out of "animals" and then including it is slightly different.
In the end, these were the four terms I found most similar. Two of these terms apply due to the specific form (polysyndeton and hendiadys) while two apply to the particular emphasis or effect (pleonasm and climax). To accurately describe the form I would, therefore, use something along the lines of "climactic polysyndeton" to describe the form used in "I love cats and mammals and animals!"
If you are merely aiming for an emphasis of redundancy, it could more accurately be termed a "pleonastic hendiadys". This would more accurate match the form of "I care for the plants and flowers."
Aside from these terms, you are on your own. The form is distinct enough from those I've listed here that I think it is a suitable target for a neologism but creating one is outside of the scope for this site.