A "standard" definition is something like "cruel," or "remorseless."
But what does this have to do with "ruth" (or lack thereof)? Is this a reference to a kind person named Ruth?
Perhaps a clue may be found from the German Rücksicht, which translates literally into "back sight," or "looking back." Could it then be that a "ruthless" person is actually one who plows ahead, without "looking back" at what the consequences may be?
And how would this evolve into the "standard" definition?
Best Answer
The meaning of ruthless, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is:
The etymology is a thornier issue. For ruthless, the etymology provided is simply "ruth n. + -less suffix." So, we turn to ruth:
Its etymology is:
Rue here means:
In the OED, the etymology for this word stretches to—I kid you not—five paragraphs. I'll give you the first of those, which contains most of the important information, I think:
The following paragraphs are even more technical, dealing with issues like strong and weak verbs in Old English and the decline of the Middle English diphthong ēu. Of particular note: none of them say anything about the name Ruth. Whether ruth and the name Ruth have a shared root I can't say for sure, but it seems to me that the OED's etymology suggests against that hypothesis.