Edit 2
After your edit, the question becomes one of whether a group of things can be taken as a collective singular, such as in this question, which asks such things as whether a dozen somethings “is” enough.
The answer is that it can be singular if you are thinking of it as one thing as a whole, just as in:
Twelve miles is much too far for me to walk before lunch.
In that sort of sentence, you get agreement like this:
- A few more games is all I have time for.
- A handful of games is all I have time for.
- A few more miles is all I have time for.
- A handful of miles is all I have time for.
It really just depends on what you’re trying to say, and how you’re trying to say it. If you want to say that five matches is more than you can handle or that three olives is too many for a martini, then yes, sure you can.
But normally plural things take plural agreement — see the ngram below, which shows that a handful of men will usually take plural agreement because men is plural, no matter the status of the a handful of premodifer.
It is only when you logically group them as one thing that they take singular agreement. By doing so, that is what you are conveying.
But perhaps your friend does not like it when the council is decided on something, as opposed to when they are divided. :)
Original Answer
Your friend is right, and you are wrong.
When you have a premodifier like a lot of, a number of, or a handful of preceding the head noun, the verb continues to agree with that head noun, instead of with the notionally singular a lot, a number, a handful, which functions more like a red herring than anything else.
Ok, seriously, these premodifiers are really acting like adjectives, not like prepositional phrases. That means the head noun remains the head noun, and there is no change to agreement:
- People think the same way.
- Several people think the same way.
- Few people think the same way.
- No people think the same way.
- Many people think the same way.
- A lot of people think the same way.
- A number of people think the same way.
- A handful of people think the same way.
As opposed to something like:
- If just one out of all those people thinks the same way as you do, you win.
Edit
Although there is a bit of room for variation here, depending on just what the writer is thinking, there is a clear dominance of the plural continuing to be used after a handful of men in this Google N-Gram chart:
Best Answer
All the answers so far miss the mark by a country mile, or are oversimplified to the point of being plain wrong.
What you are proposing here is called notional concord:
The corresponding Wikipedia entry is synesis:
Notional concord is quite common in English:
Conversely, quoting one of Edwin Ashworth's comments on this page (emphasis added):
So, the question is not whether notional agreement is a thing. The question is, whether it is a thing in this one particular construction you are looking at here, "There are no shortage".
And there is no way at all to answer that question on a theoretical level, without actually looking at what native speakers actually say and write. Any answer that does not look at the reality of the language is not an answer, but mere opinion.
So, after this long-drawn-out preamble, let us look at the reality of the language, then.
Here are the actual usage stats from the British National Corpus (BNC) and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA):
We can clearly see that notional agreement in this particular construction is indeed possible. So you are not wrong in saying you can keep it.
At the same time, we can clearly see that singular agreement is preferred in this particular construction, by an impressive margin in the UK, and by an order of magnitude in the US. So your colleague is not wrong in preferring it in your sentence as well.