I have hard time understanding why in this phrase, property is preceded with a definite article. As this book is one of many properties, the indefinite article sounds more natural, to me.
Of course, I'm wrong, but I would like to know why.
articlesdefinite-articlesindefinite-articles
I have hard time understanding why in this phrase, property is preceded with a definite article. As this book is one of many properties, the indefinite article sounds more natural, to me.
Of course, I'm wrong, but I would like to know why.
Best Answer
I don't think that either of the previous answers truly nails the rationale behind this usage. I don't think the following does either, but I consider the reasoning a useful addition.
Both
and
are quite acceptable.
This argues that qualification of a noun is not the sole factor involved.
(Though these versions are near-interchangeable, the one with the definite article carries at least a hint that the need to inform people of interest-rate changes is common knowledge. And, although the version with the indefinite article may be said to carry a hint of other responsibilities, I'd say that this isn't a count-noun usage.)
Perhaps it's possible only to say that the definite article is often the default choice (or perhaps on occasion just a choice) with non-count nouns in expressions that have become idiomatic:
......
... but note